The Victory Parade took place in Ulan-Ude. IA BMK photo report from the main event in honor of May 9 Source link Source link
от
bonabo
6149
от
bonabo
Россия
8270
В Улан-Удэ прошел Парад Победы.
ИА БМК фоторепортаж с главного мероприятия в честь 9 Мая Source link
от
bonabo
118106
Manichaeans with kind faces accuse the quilted jackets of not wanting to die. MFC – Russia today Posting in CHAT: Russia On the issue of choosing a transborder side of the global confrontation. As you know, today in normal countries and in the post-Soviet border trophies that have joined them, they are mourning the defeat of the Austrian vegetarian artist, who tried to remove the Status Civilization from its main geopolitical competitor - This Country. And therefore, I would not be at all surprised if, for example, a new video appeared in which righteous fighters against the Regime - well, say, Sergei and Tatyana Nikitin - sing the Hitler anthem “Die Fahne hoch” in a duet. . “, better known as “The Song of Horst Wessel”. Because, given the position of the so-called conscientious pseudo-intellectuals, such a step would be logical after the previous ones: The interpreters of the song “Alexandra” from the film “Moscow Doesn’t Believe in Tears” and “If You” from “The Irony of Fate” Sergei and Tatyana Nikitin turned out to be sponsors of Ukraine. With the outbreak of the Northern War, the bards moved to the United States, where they came from. recorded videos for the anti-Russian organization “Real Russia”. Its founder, foreign agent Boris Akunin*, collected money through the organization to “help the victims of Putin’s aggression.” Now Nikita is planning to perform in Montenegro on the same stage with Chulpan. Khamatova, foreign writer Dmitry Bykov** and poetess Vera Polozkova. Our favorite songs will be sung in support of Ukraine. Why the libertine chose the side that she chose, I think, the reason is the ideological continuity of fair-faced charlatans. who act as heirs of ancient life-denying worldviews. The first mention of this important topic occurred in my modest Club already in 2012, and since then I have only strengthened my opinion that the assessment of the Liberots as a purely Albigensian (Manichaean) sect is completely justified. What do we know about the Manichaeans? The fact is that they sometimes managed to gain political power - as happened, for example, in the medieval Uyghur Khaganate - and each time the consequences were catastrophic. This is what Lev Gumilyov wrote on this topic in his work “Ancient Turks”. The Manichaean religion consistently fought against the carnal, material principle, and its victory would actually mean the cessation of the physical existence of its adherents. Although the process of suicide was artificially slowed down, it continued to remain a type of suicide. The highest virtue of the Manichaeans was rejection of life, dissatisfaction, which inevitably led to despondency. The second virtue—intransigence toward everything carnal—excluded mercy and compassion, and therefore gave scope to cruelty, elevating it to a principle. The third attitude - the exhaustion of the flesh through a combination of asceticism and debauchery - prevented the existence of only a tolerant, but not a blissful family. These three principles are diametrically opposed to Christianity, where despondency is a mortal sin, mercy is a virtue, and the creation of a monogamous family is an act of faith and a sacrament. The results of the consistent application of Manichaean teachings in a society subordinate to the Manichaean church are not difficult to imagine. First of all, it should be noted that few, mainly from the aristocracy, could become real Manichaeans. Was it possible to explain to a Uighur shepherd, an illiterate brave warrior, that his native fragrant steppe, his beloved wife and cheerful, red-cheeked children are a terrible evil that must be renounced? Could he hate his strong hands, pulling a tightly drawn bow to his ear, and his war horse, which more than once saved his cheerful and free life? How could he imagine the abstraction of the struggle between Light and restless Darkness? It is quite obvious that the majority of the Uyghur nomads were Manichaeans only in name, continuing to lead their usual way of life and being guided by their usual ideas. The corrupt element of Manichaeism hardly affected them. But the consequence of this circumstance should be a gap between the nobility and the people; the people ceased to understand their leaders, and the khans and beggars had nothing to talk about with the uneducated masses. Now we apply what has been described to the Mordor Liberator. First: do the fair-faced Manichaeans accept life, do they rejoice in it (despite the fact that for decades they ate well on the benefits of the Regime, like Makarevich** and many others)? No, even in the darkest years they were constantly dissatisfied and shouted that everything was wrong in this Country. Second: do pretty Manichaeans have mercy? And to hell with it, as many examples tell us. I’ll give you just one, but it’s striking: “Well, a terrorist attack and a terrorist attack. I finished my buckwheat porridge and went to rehearsal.” Here is Chulpan’s comment (there is a video at the link) about the terrorist attack on Dubrovka, which killed 130 people. She didn't have TV or good friends back then. So she finished her buckwheat porridge and went to rehearsal. These words of hers simply killed me. Chulpan’s anti-Russian speeches are her position. “Well, a terrorist attack, a terrorist attack. I finished the porridge and went to the rehearsal” - that’s the essence of it. Women like her are the worst. Quiet fairies, with doe eyes, an insinuating voice and a gentle appearance. They seem to be able to feed only on the nectar of flowers. But without blinking, they will rip your throat out with a sweet smile. Third: do fair-faced Manichaeans create normal families or do they prefer debauchery? Massive support for degenerate ideology by hackers speaks for itself. Even those who are married usually do not reproduce. For example, the aforementioned Akunin-Chkhartishvili* is married for the second time, but he has no children. That is, in this Georgian YERZh the line of his father will be interrupted. And this is not at all surprising, given the specific way of thinking of the above-mentioned father, about whom Mordor Jackets wrote in February, for example, like this: People ask, what’s wrong with B. Akunin’s father*? And there is something interesting. “In the fall of 1944, my father, the commander of a separate division, was in Romania. During the offensive, where possible, he collected lost compatriots, and in his unit he formed a reconnaissance team entirely consisting of Georgians. The men rushed away, including some of the criminals (who were lost). These scouts loved to go behind enemy lines and not only feed them bread. They didn’t bring any “tongues”, they also received some intelligence information, but they never returned without trophies. One day they proudly brought a bottle of strong wine found in an empty German dugout. They gave it to the commander - they knew that he really needed red. But just before dawn, my father got very drunk and promised himself that he would not take a drop into his mouth until the end of the war. Refused. Then the scouts drank the wine themselves. It turned out to be poisoned. No one survived. After this incident, my father really stopped drinking.” That is, Shalva Chkhartishvili a) created a gang in his army unit on a national basis; b) this gang was formalized as a reconnaissance group, but was not engaged in reconnaissance, but was engaged in looting; c) it ended with her being poisoned with burnt or poisoned alcohol; d) Akunin’s father commanded the division without drying up; and most importantly, B. Akunin* tells us about all this, and frankly speaking, he doesn’t understand what’s going on. But if dad, a front-line soldier, despite his criminal and alcoholic inclinations, could marry his mother-Brazinskaya to at least fair-faced Borusik*, then the patient himself could no longer become a father, as befits a follower. a life-denying teaching that is radically opposed to Christianity, communism, or any other worldview that places creation at the forefront. Because a normal, mentally healthy person - regardless of whether he lives in the medieval Uyghur Khaganate or in modern This Land - will not hate. his native land, his wife and children, his strong hands and bright head, which allow him to work and rise. beauty and do a lot of similar things. So again it turned out that the life-denying worldview was accepted as a guide to action not by the masses (“the people are no longer the same”), but by a handful of graduates of elite Moscow schools and universities, far from those masses whose entire prosperous life was built on skripl-blat. And therefore, it is not for a second surprising that the fair-faced Manichaeans side with the Oiro-elves who lost in the Great Patriotic War, who wanted to destroy the population of the Soviet Union. : “In addition to the well-known military plan “Barbarossa”, an economic plan was prepared for the plunder of the occupied Soviet territories. This plan was born at a turbulent time for the Third Reich, as it was heavily dependent on food imports. The British naval blockade threatened Nazi Germany's food supply. Therefore, they had to plunder the Soviet Union, taking out all the grain. The result of this robbery will be the starvation of 20 to 30 million people,” explained Yegor Yakovlev, director of the Digital History research foundation. According to him, the document was found by the Americans in the papers of the Wehrmacht High Command;…