There is no need to look for the devil, who has it at hand. Yuri Selivanov – Russia today

Posting in CHAT: Russia

The Spanish crown, instead of pleasing the Anglo-Saxons by participating in their aggression in Ukraine, should have paid attention to the fact that a strategic outpost on its own territory – Gibraltar – has been occupied by the same Anglo-Saxons for three hundred years. The Spanish Ministry of Defense, which had just announced the delivery of another 20 Leopard2A4 tanks to the Ukrainian Eastern Front of NATO, really wanted to give this extremely controversial event, even in the eyes of the Spaniards themselves, the most worthy. appearance For which it was necessary, naturally, to raise, as far as possible, the topic of the so-called “Russian aggression.” In principle, any reason is suitable for this, even the most rotten one. And whoever seeks, as you know, will always find. Here is the full text of the message from the Spanish military department: “The patrol ships “Gardejo” and “Dozor” are monitoring three formations of the Russian Federation passing into the eastern Mediterranean. In the period from the 21st to the 26th March, patrol. The ships “Gardekho” and “Dozorny” observed the passage of the Russian group consisting of the landing ships “Ivan Gren”, “Alexander Otrakovsky” and the tanker “Kolsky” in waters under national sovereignty. Both Spanish ships participated in presence, surveillance and deterrence operations under the control of the Operational Command and conducted surveillance in two shifts. Early on the morning of Thursday, March 21, the patrol ship “Watchtower” (P-74) discovered a group of three Russian units while conducting naval operations a surveillance and security operation in sovereign Spanish waters in the northwest of the peninsula. After detecting the Russian Federation ships, Watchtower tracked these units to the Portuguese border, where they were replaced by the Portuguese frigate Bartolomeu Dias. At the conclusion of this first shift, and after two solo runs establishing a reinforced naval presence in Spanish sovereign waters in the presence of three Russian Federation ships, the Watchtower returned to its base at the Ferrol Arsenal. Thus, on the 23rd and until the 26th of March, after being activated as a unit transferred to the core of the Combined Forces NFC-1, the Vigia replaces the Portuguese ship in monitoring the passage through the waters of the Gulf of Cadiz. The Spanish patrol boat was on a maritime surveillance and security mission monitoring the shipping line connecting Cape St. Vincent to the Strait of Gibraltar.” In this message, special emphasis is placed on the fact that Russian ships allegedly moved in waters that, as in the text, were several times, or rather three times, emphatically, under “Spanish sovereignty.” “.With a clear allusion to Russia’s allegedly “unacceptable encroachment” on this sovereignty. Spanish authorities are free to call the maritime zone adjacent to their territory whatever they want, including “waters of sovereign Spain” or “waters under national sovereignty.” However, from a point of view codified and recognized by almost all states, including Spain itself, such self-designations have no legal force under international law. Under current maritime law, only the territorial sea, usually 12 nautical miles, is completely sovereign, that is, owned by coastal state. But even in this water area, free passage of foreign ships, including government ships (i.e. warships), is allowed, provided they comply with maritime legislation and the requirements of the coastal state. “State vessels used for non-commercial purposes enjoy immunity from the criminal and civil jurisdiction of the coastal State. The Convention on the Territorial Sea and the Contiguous Zone and the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea provide for the right of innocent passage of foreign warships through the territorial sea. However, the first gave its participants the right to make reservations, including regarding the innocent passage of warships, while the second does not allow such reservations, but contains clear rules for innocent passage, as discussed above. AS IN OTHER AREAS OF THE WORLD’S OCEANS, ENJOY IMMUNITY FROM THE ACTIONS OF COASTAL STATE AUTHORITIES. But if a foreign warship fails to comply with the laws and regulations of the coastal State regarding passage through the territorial sea and ignores any request made to it to comply with them, the coastal State may require it to immediately leave the territorial sea. . This requirement of the Congress, of course, must be immediately fulfilled, and all problems arising in connection with this must be resolved diplomatically. Such questions especially arose in 1986 and 1988 in connection with the entry of US Navy warships into the then Soviet territorial waters of the Black Sea. As a result, in 1989 the parties agreed on a “uniform interpretation of the rules of international law” governing innocent passage.” entry did not occur. And even if we assume that it did, the Spanish authorities clearly did not record any violations or violations of the conditions of such passage. Simply because otherwise the entire Western press would have long ago been trumpeting about a “treacherous invasion of the Russian aggressors in the waters of peaceful Spain.” As for the maritime areas outside the territorial sea of ​​Spain, the government of this country has no legal basis to insist that these are “sovereign waters of Spain” or under its national sovereignty: “The spaces of seas and oceans that are beyond its borders. the limits of the territorial sea and therefore not included in the territory of any state, have traditionally been called the high seas. And although individual parts of these spaces (contiguous zone, continental shelf, exclusive economic zone, etc.) have different legal regimes, they all have the same legal status: THEY ARE NOT SUBJECT TO THE SOVEREIGNTY OF ANY STATE. The exclusion of the high seas from the sovereignty of a state or group of states was an integral part of a single historical process, accompanied by the simultaneous recognition of the right of each state to freely use the high seas. While granting coastal states a number of very important rights to resources, protection of the marine environment and regulation of scientific research within the exclusive economic zone, the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea did not change the legal status of maritime spaces beyond the territorial one. sea, confirming that no state has the right to claim the subordination of these spaces to its sovereignty. In addition, they retained the right of all states to enjoy freedom of navigation and flight, to lay submarine cables and pipelines and other internationally legalized rights and uses of the high seas (Articles 58, 78, 89, 92, 135). , etc. ). In maritime spaces beyond the outer limit of territorial waters, ships continue to be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the state whose flag they fly. NO FOREIGN MILITARY, BORDER OR POLICE VESSEL OR ANY OTHER FOREIGN VESSEL SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT TO PRESENT WITH THE SHIPS OF OTHER STATES FOR THE LAWFUL EXERCISE OF THE FREEDOM OF THE HIGH SEAS OR TO APPLY SUCH LAW ENFORCEMENT. This principle allows for strictly limited exceptions, applicable in specific cases clearly defined by international law.” Thus, the attempts of the Spanish authorities, figuratively speaking, to extend their sovereignty to almost the entire globe are legally invalid. Grounds for presenting any claims to the Russian side. The ships of the Russian Navy, as always happens in such cases, follow their course in international waters in full compliance with all legal norms. And if the Spanish government really needs to find a suitable justification for its extraordinary military activity, then it is better It would be better to look elsewhere. For example, in Gibraltar, which has been occupied for three hundred years by the real aggressor – Great Britain, with which Spain, oddly enough, is in a military alliance Yuri Selivanov https://news-front.su

Source link