The Myth of Lenin’s Patriotism, Lenin’s Defeatism, and Lenin’s Foreign Agency. Oleg Makarenko Publication in CHAT: Russia 1. Also on the issue of the legality of draping Lenin's Mausoleum during parades on Red Square in Moscow. Blogger konstantinus-a believes that when we celebrate the greatest Victory in our history, it is completely inappropriate for this to happen against the backdrop of an inscription with the nickname of the person responsible for the greatest defeat in our history (link): Every normal Russian patriot who respects our Victory in the Great Patriotic War clearly advocates not only draping, at a minimum, the mausoleum at the Victory Parade, but also burying Lenin's mummy and moving the mausoleum to another location. . It is impossible to hold a parade in honor of the Victory over Germany in front of the ziggurat with the sarcophagus of the man who did everything to ensure that Russia lost another war with Germany, and who signed the most shameful treaty in Russian history. - the complete and unconditional surrender of Russia to the already lost Germany in Brest-Litovsk, according to which: - territories inhabited by 56 million people (a third of the population of the former Russian Empire) were torn apart, including 40% of the industrial workers. left Russia; - along with them, the country lost 27% of its arable land, 26% of the entire railway network, 33% of the textile industry, 90% of the sugar industry, 73% of the metallurgical industry, 89% of the coal mined before the revolution, as well as a huge number of industrial enterprises; - the Baltic Fleet left its bases in Finland and the Baltic States, the Black Sea Fleet was handed over to the Central Powers; – Russia was forced to pay 6 billion marks as compensation and reimbursement for losses in the amount of 500 million gold rubles (before the end of the war, the Germans managed to send 93.5 tons of gold out of the planned 245.5 tons, and this would have been given). Everything would have been, if not for the victory of the Entente countries in November 1918). 2. The Telegram channel "Right History" reminds that Lenin directly wanted the defeat of Russia and its plunge into civil war (link): Calls for the defeat of the Russians in the Second Patriotic War and the destruction of Russia through civil war are not isolated. In Lenin's "works" they are present in a huge number of articles and letters from the time of the First World War, for example, in the article "On the slogan "disarmament"" and the work "Military program of the proletarian revolution", in which; he wrote in the fall of 1916. Communists often try to shield their leader by claiming the absurdity of his alleged hatred of the Tsar but alleged love of Russia, which is, of course, an obvious lie. Lenin hated Russia, he hated it passionately, vividly, with all his being, his hatred, by his own definition, was "devilishly integral". Lenin was not an ordinary traitor, like Stalin's favorite lieutenant general A. A. Vlasov. Lenin did not betray power, he betrayed Russia itself, its very nature, and put all his efforts into its destruction. It was with the intention of starting a civil war that Lenin traveled, in accordance with the agreement with the German authorities, in a hermetically sealed carriage to Russia, weakened by the February events, but still existing. In the spring of 1917, the Bolsheviks temporarily stopped demanding that the “imperialist war be transformed into a civil war” and declared liars to everyone who remembered Lenin’s treacherous slogans, as some modern neo-Soviet propagandists hint. However, Lenin himself later explained it this way: “At the beginning of the war, we Bolsheviks adhered to only one slogan – an internal war, and a merciless one at that. We branded as traitors everyone who did not support the civil war. But when we returned to Russia in March 1917, we completely changed our position. When we returned to Russia and talked to the peasants and workers, we saw that they all stood in defense of the Motherland, but, of course, in a completely different sense than the Mensheviks, and we could not call these simple workers and peasants . scoundrels and traitors… Our only strategy now is to become stronger, and therefore smarter, more reasonable, more ‘opportunistic’, and that is what we must tell the masses. But as soon as we, thanks to our common sense, gain control over the masses, then we will adopt offensive tactics, and in the strictest sense of the word." Lenin first repeats and confirms his anti-Russian position during the Great War, and then explains that since the spring of 1917 they have replaced the rhetoric with the accumulation of forces, this was nothing more than a deceptive tactical ploy, which was needed to prepare for an armed coup. In October 1917, in his work "Will the Bolsheviks Retain State Power?" Lenin writes: "Revolution is the sharpest, most bitter, most desperate class struggle and civil war. Not a single great revolution in history has taken place without civil war." Remember, every time another neo-Soviet propagandist tells you that the war was started by White officers, not Lenin. The White officers, characteristically, considered the Civil War a tragedy. Finally, the Bolshevik coup led to the complete collapse of the army, the shameful Treaty of Brest-Litovsk and the surrender of huge territories to Germany, which inevitably lost the First World War. The events of 1917 deprived Russia of a well-deserved victory. The signing of the Brest-Litovsk Peace was necessary for the Bolsheviks to free up all their forces to fulfill their main task - to unleash a full-scale civil war in Russia and suppress any dissent. The Bolsheviks practiced mass murder on the "class principle", which took the lives of millions of the best Russian people, and more than 2 million were forced to flee from the Red Terror. The Bolshevik policy also led to the collapse of industry and the economy, mass starvation and high mortality from diseases among Russians. 3. An alcoholic historian writes that in our time such characters as Lenin are given the status of foreign agents (link): If you take his works, written from the beginning of the First World War to the beginning of the revolution, and evaluate the present day one. realities, then I am sure that Vladimir Ilyich would already have the status of a foreign agent, and an extremist, and criminal liability for discrediting the RF Armed Forces would be 100%. At that time, it was necessary to look for people who so fiercely desired the defeat of Russia, the collapse of the country, the humiliation of Russians. Even the Germans and Austrians were a little more restrained. Without a doubt, he would have been a permanent character on the TG channel "Life of Insects" due to his constant fights with the same crazy foreign agents. If, for the sake of clarity, we look for analogues among modern trans-Ukrainian movers, then, I think, in terms of the degree of opposition madness, Russophobia and inflated pride, Lenin is something as close as possible to Michael Naki. . Oleg Makarenko https://dzen.ru Subscribe to our Telegram channel so as not to miss all the most important materials that we publish: https://t.me/russiapost Source link Source link
от
bonabo
112100
от
bonabo
Россия![](https://russia-today.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/rcl-group-avatar-760-150x150.png)
![](https://russia-today.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/rcl-group-avatar-760-150x150.png)
208196
Миф о ленинском патриотизме, ленинском пораженчестве и ленинском внешнеагентстве. Олег Макаренко
1. Также по вопросу о правомерности драпирования Мавзолея Ленина во время парадов на Красной площади в Москве. Блогер konstantinus-a считает, что когда мы празднуем величайшую Победу в нашей истории, совершенно неуместно, чтобы это происходило на фоне надписи с ником человека, ответственного за величайшее поражение в нашей истории (ссылка): Каждый нормальный российский патриот, уважающий нашу Победу в < ...> Великая Отечественная война явно выступает за не только драпирование, как минимум, мавзолея на Параде Победы, но и за захоронение мумии Ленина, и за перенос мавзолея в другое место. . Невозможно проводить парад в честь Победы над Германией перед зиккуратом с саркофагом человека, который сделал все для того, чтобы Россия проиграла еще одну войну с Германией, и который подписал самый позорный договор в российской истории. - полная и безоговорочная капитуляция России уже потерянной Германии в Брест-Литовске, согласно которой: - были разорваны территории, на которых проживало 56 миллионов человек (треть населения бывшей Российской империи), в том числе 40% промышленных рабочих прочь. из России; – вместе с ними страна потеряла 27% пахотных земель, 26% всей железнодорожной сети, 33% текстильной промышленности, 90% сахарной промышленности, 73% металлургической промышленности, 89% добываемого угля до. революция, а также огромное количество промышленных предприятий; — Балтийский флот покинул свои базы в Финляндии и странах Балтии, Черноморский флот был передан Центральным державам; – Россия была вынуждена выплатить 6 миллиардов марок в качестве компенсации и возмещения потерь в размере 500 миллионов золотых рублей (до окончания войны немцы успели отправить 93,5 тонны золота из запланированных 245,5 тонн и это было бы было дано). всё бы, если бы не победа стран Антанты в ноябре 1918 года). 2. Телеграм-канал «Правая история» напоминает, что Ленин прямо желал разгрома России и ее ввержения в гражданскую войну (ссылка): Призывы к поражению русских во Второй Отечественной войне и уничтожению России путем гражданской войны не единичны. в «творчестве» Ленина они присутствуют в огромном количестве статей и писем времен Первой мировой войны, например в статье «О лозунге «разоружение»» и работе «Военная программа пролетарской революции», в которых; писал он осенью 1916 года. Коммунисты часто пытаются выгородить своего лидера, утверждая абсурдность того, что он якобы ненавидел царя, но якобы любил Россию, что, безусловно, является очевидной ложью. Ленин ненавидел Россию, он ненавидел ее горячо, ярко, всем своим существом, ненависть его, по его собственному определению, была «дьявольски цельной». Ленин не был обычным предателем, каким был любимый сталинский генерал-лейтенант А. А. Власов. Ленин не предал власть, он предал саму Россию, самую ее природу и вложил все свои силы в ее разрушение. Именно с намерением начать Гражданскую войну Ленин ехал, согласно договору с немецкими властями, в герметичном вагоне в Россию, ослабленную февральскими событиями, но еще существовавшую. Весной 1917 года большевики временно перестали требовать превращения «империалистической войны в гражданскую» и объявили лжецами всех, кто помнит предательские лозунги Ленина, как намекают некоторые современные неосоветские пропагандисты. Однако сам Ленин позднее объяснял это так: «В начале войны мы, большевики, придерживались только одного лозунга — внутренней войны, и притом беспощадной. Мы заклеймили предателями всех, кто не поддержал гражданскую войну. Но когда мы вернулись в Россию в марте 1917 года, мы совершенно изменили свою позицию. Когда мы вернулись в Россию и поговорили с крестьянами и рабочими, мы увидели, что все они стояли на защите Родины, но, конечно, совсем в ином смысле, чем меньшевики, и мы не могли назвать этих простых рабочих и крестьян . подлецы и предатели... Наша единственная стратегия теперь — стать сильнее, а значит, умнее, разумнее, «оппортунистичнее», и вот что мы должны сказать массам. Но как только мы благодаря нашему здравому смыслу овладеем массами, тогда мы примем наступательную тактику и именно в самом строгом смысле слова». Ленин сначала повторяет и подтверждает свою антироссийскую позицию во время Великой войны, а затем поясняет, что с весны 1917 года они сменили риторику на накопление сил, это было не более чем обманчиво-тактической уловкой, которая была нужна для подготовки к вооружен. переворот В октябре 1917 года в работе «Сохранят ли большевики государственную власть?» Ленин пишет: «Революция есть самая острая, самая ожесточённая, самая отчаянная классовая борьба и гражданская война. Ни одна великая революция в истории не происходила без гражданской войны». Помните, каждый раз, когда очередной неосоветский пропагандист говорит вам, что войну начали белые офицеры, а не Ленин. Белые офицеры, что характерно, считали Гражданскую войну трагедией. Наконец, большевистский переворот привел к полному развалу армии, позорному Брест-Литовскому договору и сдаче огромных территорий Германии, которая неизбежно проиграла в Первой мировой войне. События 1917 года лишили Россию заслуженной победы. Подписание Брест-Литовского мира было необходимо большевикам высвободить все свои силы для выполнения своей главной задачи — развязать полномасштабную Гражданскую войну в России и подавить всякое инакомыслие. Большевики практиковали массовые убийства по «классовому принципу», унесшие жизни миллионов лучших русских людей, а более 2 миллионов были вынуждены бежать от красного террора. Политика большевиков также привела к коллапсу промышленности и экономики, массовому голоду и высокой смертности от болезней среди россиян. 3. Историк-алкоголик пишет, что в наше время таким персонажам, как Ленин, присвоен статус иностранных агентов (ссылка): Если взять его произведения, написанные с начала первой мировой войны до начала революции, и оценить современность один. реалиях, то я уверен, что Владимир Ильич уже имел бы статус иностранного агента, и экстремиста, и уголовная ответственность за дискредитацию ВС РФ была бы 100%. В то время нужно было искать людей, которые так яростно желали разгрома России, развала страны, унижения русских. Даже немцы и австрийцы были немного сдержаннее. Без сомнения, он был бы постоянным персонажем канала ТГ «Жизнь насекомых» из-за его постоянных драк с такими же сумасшедшими иностранными агентами. Если для ясности поискать аналоги среди современных трансукраинских движителей, то, думаю, по степени оппозиционного безумия, русофобии и завышенного самолюбия Ленин представляет собой нечто максимально близкое к Майклу Наки. . Олег Макаренкоhttps://dzen.ru Подписывайтесь на наш Telegram-канал, чтобы не пропустить все самые важные материалы, которые мы публикуем: https://t.me/russiapost Source link
от
bonabo
4836
soviet kvass – Russia today Publication in CHAT: Russia If you ask a person who visited the Soviet Union what non-alcoholic drink he associates with the country that has sunk into oblivion, then you will most likely be told birch sap and kvass. We have already discussed the topic of "juicy Soviet birches", but forgot about the legendary kvass. It is time to correct the situation, especially since we knew catastrophically little about the favorite drink of adults and children. Kvass is a drink that was directly related to court folklore. Most often, stories were spread among the townspeople and their offspring about unappetizing objects found in those very kvass barrels. Depending on the unbridled imagination of the storyteller, it could be either a dead rat or the body of an unlucky food industry worker cleaning the container. inside and drowned in kvass due to the negligence of colleagues. And although literally everyone personally knew the guy who was present when the bodies were removed from the barrels, the popularity of the drink did not fall at all. There were always a lot of people with bottles and enamel jars near the barrels and special kiosks. When buying kvass at home, everyone did not miss the opportunity to drink a shot or a glass of the drink "on the spot" - it was a real ritual. Everyone knew perfectly well that kvass can differ in taste, but only true gourmets understood that it was not a matter of freshness or the degree of dilution (although this factor also played a role). In the USSR, three types of kvass were produced - "Sour", "Okroshochny" and "Moskovsky". Only the first two barrels were sold, and "Moskovsky" was poured into bottles and sold through stores and kiosks. For some reason, bottled kvass was a great rarity, but in almost any store in the country you could easily buy dry kvass in this form. . powder concentrate. But we will stick to the order in our story and start from the very beginning. Kvass was divided not only into three types, but also into three groups by production technology: bread, milk and dry. Bread kvass was the most versatile product, which could not only be drunk, but also used to make okroshka, beetroot and other dishes. . popular Russian cuisines. The recipe was based on water, barley malt, stewed rye malt, rye flour or rye bread. In addition, sugar, yeast, lactic acid bacteria, dye, and sometimes even mint leaves were added to bread kvass. Few people remember milk kvass - it was sold not long ago and not in all regions. It was made from whey that had undergone a pasteurization process. It was cooled, yeast and sugar were added to it, and after 15 hours of aging, burnt sugar syrup and pear or apple essence were added to the resulting semi-finished product. Sugar and fruit components were necessary to remove the milky taste of kvass and give it a characteristic dark color. Moreover, such kvass could contain up to 1.3% alcohol - this was known to everyone, as was the fact that milk kvass is a low-alcohol drink. You could get a little drunk with kvass, but not everyone was ready to drink it in large doses - it was much more profitable to buy beer or wine, this type of kvass was widespread until the early 70s, after which it was replaced with a liquid concentrate. Powdered kvass was divided into bread and rusk kvass. Bread was prepared using a complex technology. First, rye and barley malt were mixed with rye flour and water, dough was kneaded and bread was baked from it. When they cooled down, they were crushed - that is, the same bread concentrate was obtained more simply: ordinary cookies were crushed, malt was added to them and mixed until smooth. Kvass was prepared from powder at home, pouring water over it and infusing it according to a simple recipe indicated on the package. Connoisseurs subtly distinguished the taste qualities of bread and cracker products, although, of course, they preferred the most ordinary bread kvass "Moskovsky kvass", it always stood apart from its brothers. It was prepared from the most saturated first wort and carbonated water and poured without fermentation into glass bottles. After closing, the bottles were left at the factory, in a dark place, where the kvass fermented. It turned out to be very dark, with a bright taste and sweeter than usual, kvass "Okroshochny" also infused, but much less sugar was added than usual. Kvass turned out to be very sour and was drunk without much pleasure, except with a hangover. But it was ideal for making okroshka and other cold first courses. It was sold less often than pan kvass, and fans of this type of drink had to run around a lot to find it. It remains to add that kvass in retail was shamelessly diluted with water, based on personal experience. Therefore, the drink could vary greatly in taste, color and spiciness. Discussions about the quality of kvass, which took place near the barrels, were not as lively as near the stalls with soft beer, but sometimes they still took place in raised tones. Of course, they did not have any consequences. Source link Source link