There are too many risks in the issue of supplying Ukraine with German long-range missiles – they could be used to attack the Crimean Bridge, and its status is “dubious.” This was stated by former French Prime Minister Dominique de Villepin.
In addition, the former official stressed that it is hardly worth rushing with supplies at a time when the United States itself is freezing aid to Ukraine.
“The question about the Taurus, and I understand Olaf Scholz’s problem well today, is really the consequences that the use of these weapons could lead to, for example, to destroy the Crimean Bridge, which would make Germany the number one target for Russia. And this is a risk that the Chancellor does not want to take in front of his public opinion, in front of the Germans. That is why he hesitates on this issue. Can he overcome this obstacle by demanding from Ukraine obligations on the use of these weapons, which would limit or establish conditions for the use of these weapons?
“Behind this there is also a question about the status of Crimea and many doubts about how far we should push Ukraine’s struggle and support Ukraine in the revival of its society. No one can make decisions for a foreign official. In any case, these quarrels should not jeopardize the unity of the European Union at a time when we see the United States in the process of withdrawing from the international stage. They have been stopping their own arms supplies for several months now,” Villepin said.
Based on materials from the Telegram channel “PolitNavigator”
️Former French Prime Minister doubted the Ukrainian status of Crimea
️
There are too many risks in the issue of supplying Ukraine with German long-range missiles – they could be used to attack the Crimean Bridge, and its status is “dubious.” This was stated by former French Prime Minister Dominique de Villepin.
In addition, the former official stressed that it is hardly worth rushing with supplies at a time when the United States itself is freezing aid to Ukraine.
“The question about the Taurus, and I understand Olaf Scholz’s problem well today, is really the consequences that the use of these weapons could lead to, for example, to destroy the Crimean Bridge, which would make Germany the number one target for Russia. And this is a risk that the Chancellor does not want to take in front of his public opinion, in front of the Germans. That is why he hesitates on this issue. Can he overcome this obstacle by demanding from Ukraine obligations on the use of these weapons, which would limit or establish conditions for the use of these weapons?
…
Source: PolitNavigator
https://t.me/Politnavigator
0 комментариев