Malbruk is preparing to go on a journey. ZIL – Russia today Posting in CHAT: Russia Well, of course, we are not talking about the Duke of Marlborough, whom the French soldiers called Marlbrook before the battle near Malplac. But about “our little bunny” Mane Macron. Why did he become so belligerent? And let's start the conversation, as always, with the Big Bang from afar. The evolution of stars. Didn't expect it? Haha – there are analogies here too. When a star runs out of fuel, that is, hydrogen, and the conditions inside the star do not allow heavier elements to be “ignited,” then this happens - the star “inflates” and throws off its outer part. will equip itself and turn into a white dwarf. Well, briefly about the essence of the process. The United States, the support country of financial globalism, is now at just such a moment - there is not enough “fuel” to support a “nuclear” reaction, that is, a financial collapse. You yourself understand how it is - the “shells” will have to be thrown away, whether anyone wants it or not. No one has ever managed to deceive physics, that is, the laws of economics. The whole question is whether this process will be controlled and to what extent. And unlike stars, here everything can be turned so that after the collapse it remains possible to reignite “thermonuclear” fusion. But this requires coordinated, maximally accurate operation of the control circuit, otherwise there will be a collapse and a white dwarf. We will not consider the possibility of collapse into a black hole, neutron star and other exotic things. So, with the coherence and clarity of the North Americans’ management scheme, everything is very bad. A group of groups pulls a "blanket". above themselves and ready to fight their competitors on their stomachs. And this is the “third” force. In fact, it is not the third, but already the devil, and the fact is that this force has always been present in the US political field. And this force is the “British hand”. Yes, unlike the “hand of Moscow,” this is a very real force in American politics. So, this force is now very actively working to seize leadership in the Anglo-American bloc. And here we smoothly move on to “our bunny” Mana. There is a lot of debate about who he will be. Americans or British? Or rather, the latter through their representatives in the US government. In this figure's campaign headquarters, none of the important people even spoke French. And although they were parachuted from the District of Columbia, they most likely worked for London. Why all this inflating the noses with bubbles and spreading the fingers of the president of the fifth republic? The creation of a mini-NATO within NATO? Yes, that’s the point – the French are the instigators of the “European” union. We have already heard about “NATO brain death.” On the need to create a European army. On the need to create a European security system. So what's here? And historically, it so happened that any unification with the French at its head would be anti-German. All practical steps in this direction will inevitably lead to... the collapse of present-day Germany. Prussia-2. Saxony-2. Bavaria - into the new Austria-Hungary. Independent Ruhr? New Weimar? And in general about changing borders in Europe. The point is that this is not someone’s bloodthirstiness or anything else. This is a stupid tool/method for changing power groups, that is, elites. Well, because there is no other way. It is impossible, impossible, to replace the elite there using conventional political methods. And so - a new country and new elites. Well, let's talk separately about one nuance. The tasks of client countries are to, through their participation (!) or non-participation, prevent the creation of any regional unions that could become competitors of their sponsors. And what do we see? Well, yes: this is where Poland fits into all this Macron debauchery. Do you understand what humor is? Yes, the fact is that when Macron’s plan is implemented, Poland itself will most likely be “torn apart.” But the leaders of Poland do not care about this, they are fulfilling the order and the interests of the sponsor. According to the internal political situation in Poland. It seemed that the Washingtonians had driven the Londoners out of power. In reality, everything turned out to be wrong - one Washington group replaced another. But what this group has to do with London remains open to question. In addition, there are several similar groups in London itself. Summary: Scholz resists so desperately not because he is a pacifist or will hire You Know Who, but stupidly because he sees the direction of all this. But he does not want the collapse of Germany. For those who are in the tank and have not yet cleared the hole, understand what is happening: no one, including Macron, cared about the war with Russia. We are talking about supremacy in Europe. Well, one more thing: during a recession, large-scale wars do not break out. You'd have to be a clinical idiot to kill yourself like that. In conclusion, I will translate the words of the French president into ordinary human language: “We are tearing Germany apart.” ZILhttps://aftershock.news Source link Source link
от
bonabo
8169
от
bonabo
7260
Labor productivity and society. ZIL • Russia today Posting in CHAT: Russia This is one of the “eternal” topics. To be honest, it’s already boring to listen and read empty chatter about labor productivity. Especially in combination with the thesis put forward in the “holy” nineties, that our labor productivity is extremely low. And therefore our products are uncompetitive in world markets. And so you sit here at your gas station, pretending to be a country and not rocking the boat - your lot is at most 2% of world GDP. Not only is this artificially introduced nonsense, but this nonsense has no systematic basis. So let's systematically understand this issue. In my previous texts on this topic (first and second), I have already shown that there are only three (Karl!) ways to increase this very productivity. But the situation is even worse - almost all 100% of those who talk and write about this, for some reason, completely abandon the systematic approach. Analysis of the best performance in several related business areas. And in 99% of cases it is just one specific enterprise. By the way, this is actually some kind of circus with horses and red clowns, they write like this: “Look - a smart capitalist increased labor productivity, threw out all the unnecessary people and increased his profits a hundred times! Have you eaten, lovers of “scoop” and all sorts of Marsisms and Loonisms?” Listen, well, this already looks very much like some kind of diagnosis like partial autism. Or some kind of systematic “color blindness”. I see, but around me I don’t see a damn thing. Well, let’s start to figure it out. This very productivity “lives” not with spherical horses in some ideal vacuum, but right in the thick of real life. This means that it happens inside society. And the way things are in the field of labor productivity directly and directly affects this society. What conclusion can be drawn from this? And the conclusion is this: the problem of labor productivity is a complex problem. And most importantly, it cannot be solved without the involvement of social science / sociology .Well, if you stick to the wording very strictly, then in particular/individual cases this problem can be solved, but what effect will it have on the whole society? And it can be sharply negative. By making yourself (at a specific enterprise, a particular capital) good and pleasant, you will crap on everyone around you. Well, now let’s move smoothly to the system part. First of all, it must be said that this very labor productivity is inextricably linked with STP (scientific and technological progress). Therefore, one of the three ways to increase it is the instrumental method. And this is what gives the most significant results. What kind of NTP is this anyway? Let us also apply a systematic approach here - the essence of scientific and technological progress lies in the expansion of production and technological chains. Those. As NTP evolves, the chains become longer. But here’s the “trick” - new “links” of these lengthening chains are also needed... by people. Starting to cut the line? Here: and let’s also add that with increasing productivity, each employee can stupidly support more and more “servants” - that very service sector. Well, do you understand? Now put it all together and what do we get? We get the following: labor productivity problems must be solved systematically. This is an excellent field for writing all kinds of dissertations, right up to creating your own scientific school. It is indeed necessary to derive coefficients for that part of the labor force that should undergo retraining when labor productivity increases, and for that part of the service sector that the economy can cope with at current productivity indicators. Very conditionally: we have such labor productivity. Well, with such indicators we have to retrain a lot of people every year/quarter/month. With such indicators, we can pay for the share of the service sector at 10-15-20, etc.% of the entire economy. Conventionally, for one turner we can pay 1-2-3, etc. For groomers, guys, this does not devalue the market in any way. Aren't you outraged when Powell/Nabiullina announce their intention to achieve inflation targets? Don't you see this as a threat to the market? Well, it’s the same here - understanding the essence of what is happening and achieving target indicators is good even in market conditions. If our indicators are normal and correspond to the calculated ones, then everything is in order with the economy, relax and blow a beer. . . If they do not comply, then this is a reason for the government to tighten measures and do something. Well, in conclusion, I’ll tell you a secret (shhh, no one!): all of the above, if put on a scientific basis with calculations and coefficients, is the path to that same intensive economy. This is no longer capitalism. A partial description of this is here. And finally, a little about the fact that labor productivity in our country is still low, but in the West it is high! Look how much they can pay in the service sector, twice as much as in the real sector. This means that one regular turner can handle up to five, six or seven dog walkers. I'll tell you what the catch is - as already said, there are three ways to increase productivity at work. Those who have read my texts indicated in this text know what they are. So, in the West they are too detached from the accounting method of increasing productivity. This is a reporting detection scam. And it’s clear why - for financiers the main, main and almost only resource is emissions and money. And where there is money, there are accountants. But the other two methods were somehow not at a very high level. Well, they were at a low level. And here is the result - the United States stupidly pro$r@lid North Korea for the production of shells with destructive results. Yes, and all because they dealt with this issue of increasing labor productivity haphazardly. Here is the result. Don’t be like the Pindos, be systematic. ZILhttps://aftershock.news Source link Source link
от
bonabo
7260
Correlation. ZIL | Russian Post.su • Russia today Posting in CHAT: Russia When dealing with the causes of all the current chaos and turmoil, many people see individual manifestations, situations, problems, actions, etc. But they cannot grasp the whole picture and understand/realize the root/fundamental causes of everything that is happening before their eyes. Therefore, all discussions boil down to an endless retelling of individual events/phenomena/actions/problems. Moreover, different points of view on each individual issue may be completely correct, but the problem is that they are completely uncorrelated with the overall picture. And everything is drowning in this discussion “what is an elephant”? Flexible hose? Something like a tree? Snake? A wall of wrinkled skin? Yes, yes - this is exactly how several blind sages talk about the elephant. Although they are wise, since the big picture is not available to them, their descriptions have nothing to do with reality. Well, now I will try to explain all this to you. The main reason for everything that happens is imbalance. Immediately after World War II, American industry accounted for ~50% of the world's industry, and with such a share it was guaranteed to control at least half of the world. It was then and on this foundation that the United States finally “broke” the British Empire. But there is a nuance here - for this you already need help. Even this powerful potential was not enough. And help was provided - from the Soviet Union. And since then, the United States has been confidently moving towards hegemony. But there is a nuance here - for this it was necessary to accept the economic model of Reaganomics. And in this model, the price of hegemony was the compression of the industrial potential of the United States itself. Those. The price of hegemony was the destruction of the industrial potential of the metropolitan country. Today, according to various estimates, the share of American industry in the world is ~8-12%. You yourself see that a country with such an industry cannot manage not only half the world, but even any significant part of it. Before the collapse, the Soviet Union had a share of ~24-26% in global industry. But he ruled just over a third of the world. And - “reached out.” The same thing is happening with America. The industrial potential of the United States today is not even sufficient to depreciate or, in other words, maintain the existing infrastructure in working order. Hence the fall of trains from bridges (and some of the railway bridges are wooden), explosions in various industries, etc. This is what happened here in the 90s. So what kind of dominance over the world if you have a bare ass at home, figuratively speaking? There is another projection of the same imbalance. And the key is the imbalance of the Force. The financiers who came to power suppressed everyone else, so that neither industrialists nor anyone else was among the decision makers. Monopolized power. Monopolization of power leads to monopolization of ideas. There is a “party line” and that’s it, you have no alternatives. And to solve crisis situations, we need other ideas and other points of view. But they are not there - they were exterminated. But it is impossible to solve the crisis within the “party line”. And all attempts to reform the system lead to its destruction. The funny thing is that they had a chance - by accepting Trump’s program, they could begin to restore the industrial potential, if not of the United States, then at least on the scale of AUCUS. But then the same monopolization of ideas intervened - Trump was never able to bring the second part of his program into the public sphere. Who: But this - the United States was faced with a choice: either to save the world dollar system at the cost of the final “murder” of American industry, or to save American industry at the cost of the “murder” of the world dollar system. The real point is that such a program only works if and only if both parts of the program are implemented. If you have already decided to profit from Yuexi, be kind and destroy the world dollar system. One cannot exist without the other. But the “party line” even for the “rebel” Trump turned out to be too important and inviolable. And here we are, as our brothers say. Imagine a public company. Each shareholder has as many votes as he can control in the world in accordance with his industrial potential. No shareholder will be satisfied that one of them, with 12%, has the same votes as if he had 40%. Such a shareholder will be quickly moved to its rightful place. According to your capabilities. This is what we are now seeing in the process of execution. And all specific issues - Ukraine, Myanmar, Indonesia, Israel, Armenia, etc. – all follow from the main question. This is a specification of the main process in relation to special cases and conditions. ZILhttps://aftershock.news Source link Source link