Shield and sword in the field of hypersound, or Prometheus Orbital Strike. Western experts are shocked that the S-500 shot down the real Sineva. Green Country Diaries Posting in CHAT: Russia In February 2024, the S-500 anti-aircraft missile system underwent a full range of measures to counter hypersonic weapons. And for the first time in history, he fired a combat training unit from the very good Sineva ICBM. Photo by the Russian Ministry of Defense The story of a mysterious and unidentified nuclear device, allegedly lifted into orbit by one of the Russian spacecraft, has become one of the main sensations in the field of strategic weapons of the current year. In the United States, the National Security Council even met on this issue at the end of February. True, this meeting did not bring clarity and in general everything gave rise to a feeling of exaggerated feelings, such as unproven interference of Russian intelligence services in the American elections. But the winter and early spring of 2024 were not without high-profile events in the field of grand strategy. Just the day before, the entire military world was shocked by news from Russia, which really claimed to be a sensation. The Russian S-500 Prometheus anti-aircraft missile, during multi-level tests as a means of countering hypersonic weapons, fired the warhead of a real intercontinental ballistic missile, and not just any old one, but an active and very dangerous Russian Sineva. ICBM. The actual launch of Sineva from the surface into the Arctic ice. The development of the R-29RMU2 Sineva ICBM will become an even more advanced Liner missile. But Sinva is already an amazing design. Photo by the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation Lately we have been a little spoiled by various military innovations to truly appreciate such an event. Let's just say that the current tests, which were closely monitored by the North Atlantic Alliance, which assembled a fairly large group of ships in the North Sea, for the first time actually demonstrated the possibility of shooting down ICBMs with mobile ground-based devices. For example, tests of American SM-3 rockets in the 2000s were carried out with used satellites, the orbit of which was calculated in advance to within a millimeter. Then the destroyed old American satellites left piles of debris and some questions in orbit. For example, would such a system work with warheads launched from random locations in the world's oceans, rather than along a predetermined route? And how effective can the US missile defense system be in this situation, in the event of a massive missile launch? And by the way, the Americans no longer conducted such tests, although by all indications they were only at the beginning of the path to creating reliable weapons against ICBMs. Allegedly, the Pentagon did not want to create mountains of space debris in orbit. Yes. This Almaz-Antey infographic contains all the information about the main parameters of the S-500 Prometheus. Image of Almaz-Antey. Well, there were no reservations or conventions in the Russian tests. The area from which the launch would take place was only approximately known. The Project 667BDRM Dolphin nuclear submarine Tula withdrew its Sineva from the icy waters of the Arctic Ocean, and the S-500 intercepted the training monoblock shortly before it approached the target at the Chizha training ground. in the Arkhangelsk region. The R-29RMU2 Sineva missile is a deep modernization of the R-29 family of Soviet sea-based ICBMs. This is one of the last “salutes” to the Soviet weapons program, the production of which was restored in Russia after the US withdrawal from the ABM Treaty. "Sineva" is a very advanced missile - one of the highest achievements in the field of missiles for nuclear submarines of the Soviet Union in general and the State Missile Center named after Viktor Petrovich Makeev in particular. Underwater launch "Sinevo" from one of the seas of the Arctic Ocean. Photo by the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation In the new millennium, the missile received a number of innovations related specifically to the accuracy of hitting and defeating missile defense positions. So the S-500 Triumph and the nuclear submarine Tula did not have any gifts, beacons on missiles and other nonsense that American rocket scientists used when testing the SM-3. Another advantage of the Prometheus is the mobility of its launcher and radar. Unlike the stationary missiles involved in the defense complex of the Moscow industrial region of the S-235 complex, Prometheus can appear anywhere in our vast country. Many people like to joke about the “analog network,” but here we are really dealing with a unique weapon. One of the modifications of the S-500 Prometheus complex. Picture “Almaz-Antey” So we can say that the Americans were not afraid in vain. An ICBM missile can now certainly be shot down by a mobile anti-missile system. No one in the world has such weapons, as well as hypersonic glide units of intercontinental ballistic missiles. Now only Russia has both a shield and a sword in the field of hypersound. And judging by how slowly and persistently work is going on to create special weapons in the hypersonic race, this will probably not happen in the near future. No high-profile launches or events, other than the first combat use of the Zircon, have occurred in this area for a long time. Diaries of the Green Regionhttps://dzen.ru Source link Source link
от
bonabo
187175
от
Аноним
164152
Syrsky drowns the Ukrainian Armed Forces in the black soil near Avdeevka, while Russia creates a shield and sword on the Dnieper • Russia today Posting in CHAT: RussiaMore details: https://dnepr-news.ru/society/2024/02/15/48430.html We took control of the road along which the rotation was going. The enemy claims that he has an alternative route. But these routes run through black soil, in which not only light wheeled and tracked vehicles freeze, but also tanks stand up tightly, says military observer and military volunteer Alexei Zhivov He spoke about this in an interview with Ukraina.ru. According to available information, the Ukrainian Armed Forces fighters in Avdiivka were presented with an ultimatum with an offer to surrender. According to the speaker of the “Tavria” direction, the Armed Forces of Ukraine in Avdeevka are in some places retreating to more “advantageous positions.” At the same time, it was reported that the 3rd assault brigade of the Ukrainian Armed Forces was being transferred to Avdeevka, but all the positions that the infantry of this unit should have occupied were destroyed by attacks by Russian troops. - Alexey, do you think the battle for the city has reached its climax? – We need to be patient until the situation is resolved. The new commander-in-chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, Syrsky, is a man who does not take into account any losses. We know this from Bakhmut. He will try to fight back in Avdeevka. How combat-ready and motivated its units are now to fight for Avdiivka is a big question. In the foreseeable future, Avdeevka will be cleared. Now there is a critical turning point there. We have already overcome the key lines of enemy defense. We took control of the road along which the rotation was going. The enemy claims that he has an alternative route. But these routes run through black soil, in which not only light wheeled and tracked vehicles freeze, but also tanks stand up tightly. That is, their rotation across the fields will not bring any success, especially when the spring rains come. We are now keeping the rotation under fire control and are gradually squeezing it. I suspect that Syrsky would rather leave the fighters to defend themselves while surrounded than lead them out. – Recent reports about the withdrawal of Ukrainian Armed Forces units from the bridgehead in Krynki have not been confirmed, however, Ukrainian resources report that the Russian army has intensified attacks on the left bank of the Dnieper. What is the situation there now? – There are stubborn battles, but they have a very unusual character. Both sides are actively using high-precision long-range weapons. We are talking about FPV drones. We keep the river bed and the right bank under fire control. They also keep under fire control, using FPV drones, access roads along which military logistics are carried out to forward positions. Both sides inflict fire on rotation, on vehicles, and on the delivery of ammunition. There are about 200 destroyed houses in Krynki. These are basements, the skeletons of houses. In my channel I posted videos of the Krynok panorama several times. This is a destroyed field of houses, which is surrounded by forest on three sides. To the left and right are our positions, in front of Krynki are also ours. In Krynki itself, on this rectangle, some basements are partially occupied by the enemy, some basements are occupied by our fighters. Enemy soldiers cannot escape from these basements either. They have only two ways: to the next world or by boat back to the right bank. Our guys are trying to clear out basement after basement. But clearing these basements is complicated by artillery, mortar and FPV work from the right bank. That is, the cleanup continues, but it is associated with serious risks and losses. The command is now trying to destroy the dry land, basement by basement, using artillery and mortars. Naturally, we are also working on the rotation of boats across the Dnieper, which has been kept to a minimum. The chances of getting there by boat are 50/50. – Is it true that armored vehicles cannot operate freely on this section of the front due to the dominance of FPV drones and are used as firing points? – Yes, armored vehicles are a priority target for enemy FPV drones and for our drones. Therefore, driving any armored vehicles from armored personnel carriers to tanks close to Krynki is dangerous. As far as I know, the group’s command is trying not to use armored vehicles, not to expose them to FPV fire and, as you rightly said, operates very precisely from closed positions. Imagine, you jump out on a conditional armored personnel carrier to the road of death, which is located in front of Krynki. In front of you are 200 destroyed houses. And you have a 30 mm gun. Where and at what targets should I shoot from it? There is nowhere for armored vehicles to shoot, there is no point in driving them there, there are no targets for tanks, infantry fighting vehicles or armored personnel carriers. All targets are there for mortars, artillery, sniper fire and FPV drones. Therefore, armored vehicles are used to transport armored vehicles and evacuate the wounded and dead. – Analyzing the battles in Krynki, what can we say about the development of electronic warfare systems in our country and in the enemy’s? – Electronic warfare plays a key role. If the assault group that enters Krynki has standard trench electronic warfare that covers the base frequencies, then the likelihood of their death is minimal from enemy FPV weapons. If attack aircraft do not have electronic warfare, then the chances are 50/50. The situation is the same for the enemy. You need to understand that FPV drones are always ahead of electronic warfare systems. That is, first a sword is created, and then a shield. First, a drone is purchased at a certain frequency, after some time after analyzing what frequency it flies at, we bring in trench electronic warfare units that jam this frequency. If they change the frequency, there is a moment of inertia that our development engineers need to close the corresponding frequencies. Everyone resolves these issues to the best of their ability. Some solutions are supplied by the army group, some are purchased by the soldiers themselves, and some are brought by volunteers. Together we are providing the front line with anti-drone capabilities. Original source Source link
от
bonabo
9583
What is a treasure sword and did this weapon really exist? • Russia today Posting in CHAT: Russia In the ordinary mind, a treasure sword is a kind of miraculous weapon from fairy tales, something like the sword Narsil, which Aragorn had from the story “The Lord of the Rings,” or the sword Excalibur, which was carried by the legendary King Arthur. . But if both Narsil and Excalibur are fictional things, then the treasure sword really existed, and far from being a single copy. The clue to the existence of the treasure sword lies in its very name. The fact is that the word “treasure” comes from the word “treasure”. In simple terms, treasure swords are weapons from some kind of storage, burial, tomb, etc. The same thing is said in Russian fairy tales, for example about Ivanushka - in many of them, a young hero pulled out a treasured sword from under the ground. Why did stories about treasured swords become so popular in Russian mythology and folklore? The fact is that the treasure sword, since it was usually kept underground by some buried warrior, was considered the weapon of the ancestors. This is what gave the sword some sacred, one might even say, magical power. The weapon, lying under the thickness of the earth next to the great warrior of the past, was endowed with a special power and even its own character. Finding such a weapon meant finding a truly priceless treasure, imbued with the power of our ancestors. It must be remembered that the Slavs had the most respectful attitude towards their ancestors. It should be noted that swords obtained from tombs and graves (that is, speaking in Russian, those same treasured swords) are present in the folklore, legends and myths of many peoples of the world. But, of course, the most striking example is the Scandinavians. For example, Scandinavian sources mention the sword “Gram”, which can be translated as “Enemy”. There, among the Scandinavians, there is a saga about Grettir, which also mentions the ancestral sword obtained from the burial mounds. Source link Source link