Private cars blocked the path for Taganrog schoolchildren – Russia today Posting in CHAT: Russia A resident of Taganrozhenka contacted the editor, who was concerned that personal transport was blocking the pedestrian zone, so schoolchildren had to go out onto the road, which poses a great risk to their life and health. “On Engels Street, 8, an unknown company, workers park their cars on the sidewalk. Schoolchildren going to school 8 have to go out onto the road, it is very dangerous. Large flow of student cars. I have already contacted the staff, they didn’t install it for several days, and now they have blocked the passage,” writes a resident. Parking on sidewalks is also prohibited. Dear residents of Taganrozh, be polite to each other and follow the parking rules: https:// t.me/bloknot_taganrog Tatyana Ivchenko Previously reported: A car rally dedicated to Victory Day 2051 was held in Taganrog News about Notepad-Taganrog Source link Source link
от
bonabo
9381
от
bonabo
11199
Anglo-Russian war. London chose the path of escalation. Vladimir Kornilov – Russia today Posting in CHAT: Russia The UK is taking the (still diplomatic) war with Russia to a whole new level of escalation. Rishi Sunak's embattled government this week announced a crackdown on Russian diplomats and our diplomatic property. Moreover, the arguments presented by British Home Secretary James Cleverley deserve special attention. The minister loudly proclaimed from the rostrum of parliament the decision to expel the military attaché from the Russian embassy because he was... “an undeclared Russian spy.” This is not a figure of speech, not a free interpretation of the words of the politician who misspoke; this follows from the official statement of his department. More, more! Then the head of the British Home Office decided to work as a speechwriter for the Russian authorities, offering rational explanations for their provocative steps: “In the coming days, we can expect accusations of Russophobia, conspiracy theories and hysteria from the Russian government. ." Overall, it couldn't have been better. It is difficult to find another interpretation of the reckless actions of London temporary workers. Even some British commentators reacted to the decision to expel the military attaché. So, Sky News columnist Dominic Wahorn. said: “The Russians may have broken the rules of the game. But the British government should have thought long and hard before making such a decision. This doesn’t come without costs.” Moreover, he explained: "Military attaches are always expected to play a role in intelligence gathering, and this is usually tolerated by the receiving party." materials of a sensitive nature, and also make recommendations to their government on these issues. And for some reason, no one has ever demanded on this basis that diplomatic representatives of this level “claim espionage,” in addition, military attaches were also used as officials. a data exchange channel to prevent risks and unforeseen escalation of the army of different countries. Thus, London did not hide the fact that senior officers of the British army communicated after the outbreak of hostilities with the attaché of the Russian embassy, Colonel Maxim Elovik, for “strengthening risk management and escalation.” Now London is increasing these risks by taking the path of escalation in our relations: “I cannot remember the last time Britain completely severed military ties with Russia.” . In 1918? This, of course, speaks to the level of immersion of the former military diplomat in the topic of his activities. Great Britain established diplomatic relations with the Soviet Union only in 1924, then broke them off for a time, and both powers noted the mutual expulsion of diplomats more than once during this century. The largest expulsion was not even after the “Skripal case,” but in 1971, when London, for far-fetched reasons, expelled 105 Soviet diplomats and officials, to which Moscow, naturally, responded with mirror measures. But even during that period of the Cold War, London did not invade the diplomatic property of the Soviet Union. Now Cleverley has announced that he is revoking the diplomatic status of the Russian embassy's country residence in Seacox Heath, located in woodland in southern England. Moreover, the British press is outright lying when they claim that this 18th-century mansion was allegedly donated to the Soviet Union in 1946. In fact, this building was bought at auction by the Soviet trade mission. London has not yet announced the confiscation of the mansion. But deprivation of his diplomatic status automatically means falling under sanctions and arrest. There is no doubt that mirror measures will follow immediately, as our foreign policy department has already warned about. Moreover, we probably have something to answer for - for example, in the center of Moscow, the official residence of the British Ambassador is set aside for a luxurious 19th-century mansion, which, according to rumors, was even named after the Queen. Elizabeth II. "the most beautiful British residence in the world." Activists have long demanded that it be transferred to the office of patriotic organizations of Russia. And who will London make worse? Also noteworthy is Cleverley's explanation of what was chosen as the reason for this lack of resources. First, he recalled the recent warehouse fire in East London. As the Russian Embassy in Great Britain explained, in this case “another spy story was invented,” which our diplomats called “a ridiculous pretext.” Rather, we are talking about a gang war between British citizens, including immigrants from Ukraine. And secondly, the head of the London Ministry of Internal Affairs recalled the recent arrest of truly suspicious Bulgarian citizens - in any case, the false documents found on them clearly indicate some kind of illegal activity. But so far the British media have managed to find only two indirect indications of the “Russian trace”: the neighbors of the “spies” indicate that they drank a lot of alcohol (not even vodka, but whiskey!), and one of the Suspect with a deadly look is called Vanya. Apparently, the British decided that Vanya could not be a Bulgarian beauty. And this is the basis for the expulsion of the Russian attache! It is clear that Rishi Sunak's government, in deep crisis after a disastrous municipal election defeat, is trying to divert public attention to the “usual suspects” responsible for all of Britain's ills: the Russians. And once the kingdom’s Minister of the Interior openly stated that he was driven by Russophobia, known to the British elite. Indeed, the cost of escalation in modern times may be much higher than even during the Cold War. Moreover, the Conservatives are cutting off even theoretical channels to the future Labor government (and no one doubts the results of the next parliamentary elections) to de-escalate a new Anglo-Russian war. A very short-sighted move! Vladimir KornilovRIA Novosti Source link Source link
от
bonabo
125113
Without her father, she will be completely lost: Bonya pushed her 12-year-old daughter onto the wrong path Now the model lives with her child in Moscow. Source link Source link