managed

Zelensky has finally managed to anger China. Dmitry Bavirin – Russia today Posting in CHAT: Russia China has declared the “peace summit” in Switzerland “not real” and, apparently, plans to organize a real one itself with the participation of Brazil and even Turkey. What was the “last straw” for Beijing? And what does this mean for Russia and its conflict with Ukraine? The specifics of the first profession and the narrow outlook of Vladimir Zelensky have more than once led Ukrainian diplomacy to failure. He intervened, played his part and ended up ruining everything because he was a showman, not a politician. The so-called peace summit in Switzerland is the show that he now considers his main one. Because this is his personal benefit and because Zelensky has two tracks in the conflict with Russia - military and political. In the military sphere, everything is bad for Ukraine - the offensive of Russian troops continues, so everything remains political when Kyiv seems to be gaining allies, and they present a joint bill to Moscow. In the West, “everything has been captured” (more precisely, the West and Zelensky have captured everything that they do not understand), so the emphasis was placed on the countries of the Global South and, above all, of course, on China, which refused to take part in the Swiss rendezvous. The offended Kiev “commander-in-chief” accused Beijing of becoming a “tool” in the hands of Moscow and pursuing Russian policies. What can I say? He shouldn't have said that. The calculation is understandable, because it is primitive: hide, take revenge and at the same time try to “take it lightly” - to prove, they say, that you are not like that. Zelensky did not take into account that China’s dependence on part of the white people is an extremely painful issue for a country that has been under foreign influence for many decades and has lost a lot because of it. “Never again” and “only ourselves” are part of not only the state dogma, but also the national mentality. As a result, any suggestion of insufficient sovereignty infuriates Chinese officials (who, by the way, must also be close to the Russians). Of course, you cannot perceive them “weakly” - this is a childish trick. Instead, Beijing is launching a diplomatic offensive, which it did when the sounds of Ukrainian dodgy talk reached the Middle Kingdom. A whole series of blows to the Ukrainian political platform followed, all of them painful. Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Mao Ning voiced a new formulation of the reasons why the Beijing representative will not go to Switzerland: the summit “does not meet China’s demands.” In other words, the parameters of the “peace conference” will be set by China, and not by Zelensky, who wanted to feel responsible for the situation. In addition, Comrade Mao Ning devalued this idea by putting forward an extremely unpleasant thesis for Ukrainians: they say, not all countries whose representatives will meet in Switzerland actually want peace for Ukraine (whatever that means). On the domestic market, Kiev propaganda continues to insist that all guests are allies of Kyiv who share its demands on Russia. Beijing testifies that this is not the case (despite the fact that it is not participating in the conference itself). A few days later, Wang Yi, the head of the Chinese Foreign Ministry and a very influential comrade in Beijing, finalized the green idea. “The more countries support the six-point consensus of China and Brazil, the closer the day when a real peace conference will be convened, and the brighter the prospects for peace will be,” he said bluntly. Thus, thanks to Zelensky’s narrow-mindedness and arrogance, a departure was made from the previous neutral-skeptical position from which Beijing observed what was happening, in favor of the final verdict that the event was “fake.” This verdict is addressed to everyone who is guided by the opinion of Beijing (and there are many of them in the world): when the time comes to end the show and begin a real peacekeeping policy, the PRC will give a signal. At the moment, Zelensky finds himself in the position of a person who has reserved a large room in a restaurant for his birthday, but guests are beginning to refuse one after another or send instead some left-wing personalities as assistants and secretaries. . - “just for show.” This does not even depend on the country’s foreign policy orientation. For example, in Switzerland there will not only be no Saudis, whose relations with the Americans are becoming increasingly difficult, but also Pakistanis, who are still in Washington’s orbit of influence. Another example is Brazil, which is about to send out a minor official for an indefinite period. The example does not seem to be indicative: Brazilian leader Lula da Silva was one of the first to be hostile to the very idea of ​​holding a “peace summit” without Russia, which is why for some time he was considered Zelensky’s head. (after the Russian president, of course) enemy. Therefore, the Kiev leader finally asked for at least one Brazilian guest, but now even Australia, part of the Ukrainian coalition, will send a representative without authority. Moreover, the position of the Australian messenger looks like a dark mockery of Kiev, the minister of the disability insurance system. But the main “betrayal” for Zelensky is the refusal of US President Joe Biden, who finally needs to highlight obviously insignificant events with his presence. However, Biden is unlikely to attend a China-style “peace summit” whenever it takes place, but for different reasons. Beijing's main interest is to become a world moderator, as Washington has been for many years, and to show that it does its job much better: where there is the USA, there is war, where there is China, there is peace, because the Americans. create problems, and the Chinese solve them. The PRC already has a diplomatic victory of historic proportions - the beginning of reconciliation between long-time and natural enemies Saudi Arabia and Iran, made possible thanks to the efforts of the same Wang Yi Xie, in the conditions of Chinese moderation. The completion of the military stage of the conflict between Russia and Ukraine is possible, this promises to be a crushing blow according to the authority and positions of the United States, which the Americans know about and suit Russia. Essentially, this is the formalization of China's bid for global leadership in the 21st century. Some US allies are already ready to adapt. What Wang Yi said was said in Istanbul and in the presence of Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan, who liked the idea of ​​a “real” peace summit. The Turks are among those whose policy is to join the winner, as happened in both World War II and the last Syrian war, when Ankara loudestly demanded the removal of Bashar al-Assad, but as a result of the fighting agreed to share responsibility for the zone conflict with Russia and Iran. However, Turks are not alone in the world. There is an absolute majority of people who want to join the winners. So far, China and Russia are winning: the Chinese are on their way, the Russians are on theirs. And in this regard, it is extremely important to emphasize the following: China’s diplomatic successes are only a consequence of the victories of the Russian army. All military conflicts sooner or later end in negotiations and peace summits. Ours with Ukraine is hardly an exception, and the Russian Federation will most likely entrust the organization of the future peace summit to China. He will deliberately give him the opportunity to gain “peaceful laurels” in order to upset America. But the hypothetical “laurels”, and the current maneuvers of Beijing, and the failure of the “peace summit”, in general, all these purely political circumstances arose only thanks to the heroic deeds of Russian soldiers committed for themselves and their country. and not because of China and its claims to world leadership. If the notorious “counter-offensive of the Armed Forces of Ukraine” had been more successful, and the Russian Armed Forces would no longer be attacking, but retreating or sitting in hopeless defense, the event in Switzerland would have been much more significant. And the Chinese would have come there, and the Saudis, and even Biden (if he could get up the ramp), and Zelensky would have beamed, laughed, presented his “peace formula” and remained the public’s favorite. This, in fact, was the West’s plan: to achieve the military defeat of Russia and ask all summit guests to sign a demand for Moscow’s surrender. But something went wrong (we remember that), as a result there are neither demands for surrender nor the “Zelensky formula” (instead there is the “Blinken formula”, where two out of three points are purely humanitarian, and the first concerns nuclear safety) , not even a “real” summit, because the “real” one, as has now been announced, will be held in China, and whether Zelensky himself will be invited is still an open question. In any case, this summit will take place later – when Ukraine finally despairs. And only the Russian soldier is working to bring her to complete despair. To its credit, China is now trampling Zelensky’s hopes. Dmitry Bavyrin https://vz.ru Source link Source link