laughed

Leafing through an old notebook… Remember the artist from Kamchatka who laughed on air (or rather, at his own slander about social benefits)? She went far. Accountant Posting in CHAT: Russia I’m just tired (well, I’m flirty, I’m not tired, but I’m pleased and proud) years later to be convinced of the correctness of the assessments of certain characters that I gave them then. Apparently for completely different reasons. I would like to remind you of the material from 4 years ago (!). And then, I will show you literally today's latest news from 2024. I put the 2020 material under a spoiler, but I highly recommend reading it. This is not just a specific example of a mixture of ignorance and hype. Such specific examples, if analyzed, show HOW you are manipulated by the civilization of the exaltation of victory. About how “officials offered beneficiaries a trip abroad for 127 rubles.” 21 century. One of the main (and probably one of the most discussed) “news of the day” in a great power of 147 million people: To be a person suffering from the harmful (and extremely unfashionable nowadays) habit of at least a little thinking and analysis. every information received, BEFORE drowning in sarcasm or fiery denunciations on this matter, I, of course, decided to make sure whether the news really deserved the laughter of the TV announcer and further all-Russian hype. An adequate person should immediately have a clarifying question: - we are talking about a one-time payment for a certain action (in this case, for a certain trip), which cynics-bureaucrats mockingly offer to perform, or something like that. compensation for this action, payment for which is divided into parts and carried out not once, but regularly, several times? The question, to put it mildly, is fundamental. For many years there has already been a manipulative national hype built on the abolition of social basket standards for those goods and services that are consumed VERIFICALLY less often than the compensation paid for them. Manipulation, no matter how vile, is just as effective. Let me explain. You have probably read in the media such phrases as: “Officials suggested that Russians buy a third of a coat,” “Officials allowed the poor to eat 8 grams of fish a day,” “The authorities said that half a shirt a year would be enough.” for Russians”, “The government has established that the norm for Russians is 5 grams of beets per day.” And the point here is not even that we are talking about the norms of the subsistence minimum (again, the subsistence minimum, and not the desirable) minimum (again, the minimum, and not the consumer basket of the average Russian). Fuck it all. The problem is that people (and not just the poor) don't eat fish every day. Even if they crack, they don't eat. But bananas are not eaten 365 days a year. I’ll tell you a terrible secret - Russians often don’t even eat our native beets every week. I don't live below the standard of living. They don’t count me and I’m not poor at all. But damn, I don't buy a winter jacket 12 times a year! I don’t even buy it once a year, can you imagine?! I'm probably a big cheapskate and I'm about to say something embarrassing, but... my winter jacket is already several years old, but unless there's an emergency before the end of this winter, I even plan to wear it next time. winter. It’s probably worth further thinking about what the manipulation is based on with the cries of “look at the blocking 5-gram and half-length standards that the bureaucrats have set for the Russians!” Not necessary? I am not arguing that the fixed basket is small or large, but I am arguing that we are talking about purely calculated norms for certain periods of time, despite the fact that many goods from this basket are purchased objectively (not even necessarily due to poverty). and are consumed over a longer period of time. So I assumed (we will remove excrement from the fan one by one) that the famous 127 rubles for “free travel on international transport to the sanatorium and back” (as the announcer or the one who wrote the text put it) is not a time-based payment. I learned that this is not a one-time payment. And monthly. More precisely, part of the monthly payment (these 127 rubles are the transport component): Well, yes, 127 times 12 is a little more than 127. It seems like 12 times. move forward He suggested that this is not a directly targeted payment, implying the obligation of the poor co-beneficiary to travel internationally. Well yes, that's true. He suggested that the state does not declare that it fully covers the ENTIRE cost of transportation expenses for international trips. Then the question arose: wait, international travel is such that not only citizens in need of social support, but even “average” citizens do it on average 1 time EVERY MANY YEARS! And not in times of crisis, but in difficult times. If 147 million residents of the Russian Federation make 20 million foreign trips per year and these are historically peak values ​​(!), and this includes those who traveled several times a year, then not only the poor, but even “on average” a Russian travels approximately once every decade. And in the 90s and in the best years of the RSFSR, people traveled less often. AND? Sorry, but 127*12*10 is 15 thousand rubles. That is, direct state assistance to a beneficiary in the amount of 15 thousand rubles only for transport during a trip for treatment is something shameful? We are talking about treatment and would it be good to travel more often? Okay, I'm not arguing. Is a few thousand rubles in aid just for transport while traveling every few years a reason to laugh? And in the end: “a trip abroad for 127 rubles, geey, aha-ha” or less hypozhorian-manipulative and less fun: “several thousand rubles of support (for trips with real, adequate frequency)”? stop So I was sitting there, thinking about how to structure the note more correctly, and suddenly I got stuck: What the hell is INTERNATIONAL transport?! No, well, there are probably exotic isolated cases, but... Mass social services (payment) from budget money for... foreign trips? Yes, it is clear that worthy, wounded people improve their health. But what does this have to do with traveling abroad? They require treatment in a sanatorium, and not on a warm beach. What's happening?! This is doubtful by definition... In short. On the Pension Fund website I found official information about these 127 rubles: I will try to write a conclusion without obscene language. It doesn’t matter that the future announcer does not know how to read the text correctly and neighs like a horse (see video) due to his own lack of professionalism. Or they wrote the text to her - ignorant people who frankly do not see the difference between the words “long-distance” and “international”. Or is all this a deliberate provocation with attribution to the main enemies of humanity, Russian officials, of a deliberately funny and mocking statement (which they did not express!). It does not matter. It is important that this incident was picked up in the regional State Television and Radio Broadcasting Company, without bothering to study the essence, by huge media with a multi-million audience (Lenta, Newspaper, MK, Yandex...), and these are millions. he himself, without thinking and without asking questions, for the 250th time will come out with arrogance, sarcasm and mockery of his own country. In a civilization of instant hype, will anyone care that the news being discussed is somewhere between manipulation and outright lies? PS Moreover, as far as I understand, even this money (in a more adequate wording than in the magazine...) is intended for those who want to take compensation in money. And the main option is to receive the service itself in kind (well, that is, the treatment itself at the sanatorium and the trip to it and back). That is, a person does not need to worry whether there is enough or not enough for a trip and stay in a sanatorium. He simply takes and receives the services himself for free. Comment from the author: Be careful, the video contains a stupid chicken who didn’t bother to find out what she was talking about: And now 4 years have passed since that half-forgotten story. Well, why did the Accountant choose this pretty girl, right? Well, I don’t understand, this happens. Well, I've lied many times, if not dozens of times. Issuance of the volume of the monthly accrual of the portion (for one future trip to the sanatorium) for the estimated total amount of compensation for travel. Well, either out of stupidity, or out of vile provocation, she called the trip by intercity bus to the medical dispensary “international.” Bring this to the point of absurdity and ridicule. After all, these are all just absurd incidents that do not characterize the inner essence of a person, right? Why label people as manipulators and provocateurs because of incidents, even ugly ones, right?... January 2024. It turns out that despite that vile slander that was never exposed in the minds of people (all of Kamchatka does not read A.S.), this sweet fool made a very good career... as a deputy. Yes, deputies. It turns out that she was…