Trump Debates Answered the Main Question About Kamala Harris. Dmitry Bavirin Publication in CHAT: Russia Much was expected of the first debate between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris. Trump supporters expected him to defeat his opponent as inexperienced and simple-minded. Harris was expected to prove herself somehow, as she remains the dark horse of American politics. He did not destroy anyone, she showed enough. "Both are worse." Among the "hidden camera" pranks that are abundant on the Internet, there is this one: a white guy approaches two black girls with the phrase "my god, what a beautiful black queen", but passes behind them - to another guy holding a huge black chess queen. There are some parallels between this situation and the one in which the United States found itself after the debate between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris. This debate was much more interesting than any duel between Trump and outgoing President Joe Biden, because it involved a "black queen", that is, Kamala Harris. There was a natural interest in a person who is currently a nobody – just a front-runner in the presidential election, but next year hundreds of millions of other people around the world will probably depend on her, and, unfortunately, not only in the US. . The world (including the US) missed the time to take an interest in Kamala earlier, because there was no reason: Kamala is an uninteresting person. She has never shone in front of the camera, performed disgracefully in the primaries, turned out to be an unpopular vice president and an ineffective president of the Senate. She is just a type in the era of diversity: a broke California attorney of Indo-Jamaican descent with a Jewish husband, who became vice president thanks to the “Clinton clan quota”, because her sister Maya was Hillary’s closest adviser. So entering the ring against Trump for many became a moment of real acquaintance with Kamala Harris, who was taken out of the comfort zone of official speeches, rabble-rousers and sycophants, and therefore was able to show her true face. I think she showed. The wait for this moment was indecently long. After the abdication of the “white king” due to his incapacity, an indecently long time passed – almost a month and a half – before the “black queen”, brought to the center of the political field, gave her first interview. It was an interview with the ultra-loyal channel CNN, it lasted less than an hour and touched on only one foreign policy issue – support for Israel. Kamala, who was suspected of having pro-Palestinian leftist views, said that she would continue to support Israel. It seemed as if the interview was released exclusively for Jewish donors from Wall Street, so that they would not be afraid to give money to the election campaign. Because everyone else did not know anything important about Kamala Harris. It seems that she does not have her own program, but in general she is for everything good and against everything bad (that is, against Donald Trump). This will not be enough. Enemies and detractors (primarily Trump himself, of course) saw the worst: that Kamala was protected from open debate because she was narrow-minded and tongue-tied. In other words, a fool. So Trump expected a triumph. Even now, he considers it a triumph, and “the best debate performance of my career.” We can agree with him if we also admit that all previous performances were just terrible. This was not terrible. Here was regular, standard Trump. The base. He still praised himself, still labeled himself, still seethed with resentment and anger, accusing his opponent of being the worst person on earth, or at least the worst president of the United States. “Biden was the worst president in history, and it will be worse,” the Republican said. It didn’t look good because it wasn’t proven. But he was probably right. On the one hand, everyone saw in Kamala what they were supposed to see: a prosecutor who has made a career out of exposing criminals, who was simultaneously trained by America’s best political strategists to expose one specific criminal – Trump (who advised, among other things, to call a criminal more often – in the case of bribery of a porn actress). So Kamala’s speech was mostly a series of categorical accusations on given topics. For example, she said that Trump intends to ban abortion in all states (a sore subject in the US), to which Trump himself responded with the word “lie”. The balance of power in the court turned the debate into a similar argument, since the ABC moderators allowed the prosecutor to interrupt the discussion and themselves intervened in the discussion to dismiss Trump (for example, by citing data showing that the crime rate in the US is currently falling, not rising). It seemed like revenge for Trump’s pre-debate insults to ABC. But that’s why he leaked it, because he suspected the network that hated him was playing along with Harris. And in doing so, he gave himself far more to “get better” than the hosts and his opponent ever did. Trump, as has been said, is still Trump with a Trumpian level of baseline knowledge, where the main channel of communication with the outside world is the comments of fans on the Internet. So he walked into a trap that wasn’t even set for him – he set it himself. Namely, he said that migrants were eating American dogs and cats. Apparently, they were referring to a hoax attributing such practices to Haitian migrants, based on the disappearance of one cat that was later found. Earlier, Trump’s vice-presidential candidate J.D. Vance fell for the same canard – and Trump, it turns out, doesn’t realize that only a bum wouldn’t laugh at Vance for it, he’s so self-absorbed. But Trump is a no-brainer, but what about Kamala? Kamala has finally proven herself sufficiently. She is a person without a political backbone, who changes her position because of popularity. She is a populist, operating with populist accusations (he destroyed democracy! He sold out his homeland to China!) and populist promises of a bright future. She does not even have a deep understanding of the program that her campaign borrowed from Biden and slightly supplemented with the votes of the poor (including the ideas of other people, including Trump). In general, she is ... like Trump. Kamala Harris shares most of her opponent's core weaknesses, but has sharp differences in demeanor. Harris looks at Trump as if he is juggling rubber ducks. Trump listens to Harris as if his liver hurts (even though he is an abstract person). Kamala has not laughed as much lately as she used to, because she did not know that hiding your incompetence with laughter is an annoying habit. Apparently, her spin doctors explained this to her. Now she suppresses this laughter, looking at her opponent with a cheerful disdain that can only be allowed under the condition of colossal intellectual superiority. But the game was equal. Nobody won, nobody lost. Trump did not crush Harris, and Harris did not rise above herself, or even Trump. The US President will definitely be a sleeve, but either a redhead (if there are problems with the consumer economy before the elections) or a black man (if there are none). Only one of them listens to her spin doctors, and the other no longer listens to anyone, only himself. In this regard, it does not matter at all what exactly these two said about the economy or Ukraine (yes, Trump again promised to end the conflict with Russia over Ukraine, but again did not say how). It does not matter whether the earrings in Kamala's ears were just earrings - or an earphone from which the tips came (the "Trumpists" now have such a theory). It is important that the evil tongues of innocent enemies have once again proven right: outside the information comfort zone, Kamala is as frightening and disgusting as Donald Trump himself, so it is not for nothing that she is shielded from discussions. “Again”, because four years ago the same evil tongues (often the same people) said about Joe Biden that he had already crossed the limit of his capacity, he is not an eagle without an incentive - and that is why he is hiding . from the public. Polls of loyal media give Kamala a victory in the debates in terms of turnout. Four years ago, according to the same polls, Biden also won all the debates against Trump, and then began to fall apart as a body and a person - and Kamala came in his place. Unless there are dramatic changes in the US economy and the presidential campaign, she will most likely replace him in the White House. But those who expected to hug the black queen are hugging a chess piece. Moreover, it is made of wood. Dmitry Bavyrinhttps://vz.ru Subscribe to our Telegram channel so as not to miss all the most important materials that we publish: https://t.me/russiapost Source link Source link
