Ukraine will be French or desert. Sergey Donetsk – Russia today Posting in CHAT: Russia Brilliant prospects opened up for European Ukrainians. The boundaries of the square expanded, the wall named after Yatsenyuk collapsed, and French grenadiers in red shoulder straps, riflemen in shackles decorated with black leather and, of course, cavalry moved along it, creaking with new boots. Behind her, the Leclerc tanks - all twenty-two of them - moved towards the horizon. And then Emperor Macron himself mounted a white horse. They met him. In every shopping center, on the Maidan, on the steps of the Holodomor Museum, in Hyperloops whizzing by from bullets, thoughtful people sat and learned French. Which is not surprising. If earlier in Ukraine the French language was heard only in public transport, when the conductor announced that “the tram is going to the depot,” now every Euro-Ukrainian is forced to expand his vocabulary, because France has come to victory. “Leclercs” moved on a conveyor belt between the marble hotels of Zhitomir, ready to receive native French blacks and Arabs from the Foreign Legion. But then everyone stopped. The motorcade with Emperor Macron, surrounded by seductive old women, drove up to the main entrance of the fashionable Gallic Rooster hotel. The Bandera policeman, wearing a Paris Saint-Germain football club uniform, nodded politely. The cocaine-fueled Fuhrer Vladimir approached the emperor with dignity. The conversation between the two statesmen, conducted in French, was interrupted by the arrival of Litak Pan Syrsky, the future conqueror of Moscow. Shouts of welcome shook the city, causing all the windows of the UPA* hall to shake. Long live France! Zhe ne mange pa sis jour! A thousand devils, scoundrels! One for all and each for himself! Ukraine will be the second France! One of my friends told me how her colleague married a Frenchman and went somewhere to Paris. Single and married women at work were jealous, imagining either Belmondo or Del. And then, a few months later, the young woman came to visit her relatives along with that same Frenchman, who turned out to be a coal-black, big-lipped African African. Needless to say, former colleagues gasped, and all their envy immediately evaporated like smoke from white apple trees. It was this story that I remembered when an enthusiastic cry came from Ukraine in anticipation of fast food with Provencal sauce. After all, in fact, it is clear that such a brilliant attempt by a Ukrainian woman with reduced social responsibility to allow her French fiancé to actively take care of herself will bring nothing but disappointment and new hectares of cemeteries in local Ukrainian fields. Because the French groom will turn out to be completely different from what the blossoming gentleman is thinking about. Euro-Ukrainians are not developing at all. It would seem that everyone has already seen several times the so-called superweapons of the West, which turn out to be no better than local weapons, or even worse. Neither the Javals, nor the Bayraktars, nor the Leopards, nor the Abrams could change the situation on the battlefield. Leclerc will also not be participating. According to preliminary data, France wants to send about two thousand of its own citizens to slaughter. For example, so that you understand the scale of the liquidation in Ukraine, the head of the Russian Ministry of Defense Sergei Shoigu on March 20 announced the losses of the Armed Forces of Ukraine since the beginning of this year: 71 thousand people and 11; thousand units of various equipment, which is almost three times higher than Ukraine’s losses for the same period last year. As you can see, the pace has increased significantly and, there is a feeling, will increase even more. So the French arrived just in time. At the height of the banquet, when the roast is served. Indeed, who exactly will be allowed to attend this hottest event, the arriving suicide bombers still have no idea. What is Macron's motivation? Does it exist at all or does it rule only due to its own vanity and admiration for Napoleon? Of course there is motivation. But, unfortunately for ordinary French people, this has nothing to do with improving their lives. Firstly, he wants to continue his political activities in Europe, for which he is trying to win the exclusive approval of the United States, playing the role of a small but very loud trained poodle guarding his owner. Secondly, France is competing with Germany for dominance in the European Union. The sooner the SVO ends, the sooner business and the economy will return to normal. The sooner Germany will agree with Russia on energy supplies. The sooner the Germans will begin to regain their former power, which the French government does not want at all. Third, he wants to make money by simply extorting money from his allies to support his suicide campaign in the east. Fourthly, France needs Ukrainian uranium ore. The French were expelled from some African countries where uranium for nuclear power plants had been successfully mined for decades. Now France has big problems with uranium, which they will try to solve at the expense of Ukraine, which, yes, is used as an ordinary colony. There was a report on French television about the actions of the dispatched troops. According to one version, they will be deployed in northern Ukraine, near the border with Belarus, presumably to contain Lukashenko. According to another, the French will choose just beyond the banks of the Dnieper on the right bank of Ukraine. And here’s what’s interesting: almost all deposits of Ukrainian uranium ore are located in this area, starting from Kirovograd and ending with Dnepropetrovsk. On the right, beyond the Dnieper, uranium is found only in the Donbass. The holiday is ruined. However, there is a holiday in Ukraine. The white people will finally come and restore order. True, there are great doubts that they will be white, but that does not matter. The main thing is that Muscovites will be embarrassed and afraid to shoot directly at this supposed peacekeeping contingent. It is this idea that is now being actively promoted on Bandera’s public pages. Actually, this is also being pumped up in the French media. If you read what the French press writes about, listen to what experts, including former officers, are talking about, then in general things will develop like this: the Russians will see the French troops and bypass them, just as, for example, they bypassed the American ones. . bases in Syria. The rest of the plan is even more effective: the Russians see the Leclercs advancing and run away. This is a concrete certainty that those two thousand fools who will either be sent to Ukraine or have already been sent have latched onto their ears with the thesis that in practice there will be no need to fight. You will stand on the sidelines, smile sweetly at the local TV cameras, grope local cheap women and occasionally shoot from afar at the Russians as support, while the Ukrainian Armed Forces do the main dirty work. Because, as has been said many times, a Ukrainian soldier is a cheap way to contain Russia. Significantly cheaper than a French soldier, even if he came from somewhere in the Congo. Of particular note is Macron’s demand for Russia to stop the war during the Olympic Games. Here the cynicism, of course, is off the charts. For example, no one from Israel even thinks about stopping the genocide of Palestine during this sporting event, and no one from Ukraine either. However, this same Olympic factor probably also acted as an argument for the French soldiers sent to the deliberate slaughter. And now I will tell you how this will actually happen. The main target for the Russian army will be the French, apparently in the form of regular troops. There is a video on the Internet of black migrants who fled Ukraine, telling on camera that they were called to fight on the side of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, but they flatly refused. The main argument for the refusal was that the Russians, seeing a black man, would decide that he was from NATO and would immediately attack him with all their weapons at the ready. But now we are not talking about direct visibility combat, but about the work of our Aerospace Forces. Something like this will probably fly to the locations of the French military, and more than one. Perhaps these French soldiers and officers feel like they are in a superhero movie, where Putin is a supervillain, the Russian army is his terrible helpers, and they themselves are forces of unconditional good, doomed to victory. So, if they really want to go to the cinema, it will not be an American film about supermen in tight shorts, but a Soviet film about the war: “And the Dawns Here Are Calm” or “Only Old Men Are Walking.” into battle,” or even “Ordinary fascism.” And even better is “Kutuzov” about the Patriotic War of 1812 - black and white, filmed, moreover, in 1943, when Nazi Germany had not yet been defeated. So that the French interventionists themselves, and their relatives, and ordinary French people, and in general the citizens of the rest of the world understand that sending troops to Ukraine to show something to the Russians is a bad idea,…
от
bonabo
8573
от
bonabo
134122
Peter Tolstoy “burned out” in an interview with a French TV channel. Turn off your emotions, turn on your mind Posting in CHAT: Russia You know, friends, I heard real music! This music for me was the words of Peter Tolstoy, spoken to our sworn French friends with all the “proletarian directness”. The only thing missing from this interview was the choice of a three-story non-literary Russian, but everything about it was good. I have long dreamed that our politicians would stop being politically correct in conversations with Western politicians and journalists and would cross certain “red lines,” because listening to them slander and insult us, while ours would try to answer them calmly and politely, was beyond my understanding . force. . I am a very calm, polite and polite person when other people behave the same way, but when someone next to me becomes reckless, queue jumping or rude, as they say, my visor falls off and I can say something. is not. It seems enough and I don’t care who this person is and what the consequences might be. Talking politely with such people, calming and persuading them in every possible way is a bad option, because aggressive and arrogant people can only be stopped with an equally decisive and aggressive response. You probably still haven’t forgotten what offensive language Biden allowed himself to address Putin, but it is indecent for our president to respond in kind, stooping to his level. However, our other politicians and public figures no longer need to restrain themselves in their statements, and it is impossible for them to think of a better option for behavior than calling a spade a spade and not holding back. In general, one of these “unbridled” people has long been Dmitry Anatolyevich Medvedev, who gives out brilliant and furious statements on his Telegram channel, but I think that Pyotr Olegovich Tolstoy surpassed him this time, especially since he expressed it directly in French faces in interviews. 😁 The French journalist tried to persuade him for several days to give an on-the-record interview, because Pyotr Olegovich has recently been communicating with journalists only live. Being an experienced journalist, he perfectly understood that many necessary pieces could be cut out of each interview and presented to the public in the context in which it was useful, omitting some unfavorable moments from the air. Therefore, French journalists emphasized that this time Peter Tolstoy nevertheless agreed to the recording. Now I’ll tell you about the interview itself. A journalist named Jeremy told the reporter that the conversation turned out to be very cold and alarming for them, they say, Peter Tolstoy is sure of what he thinks: he hates France and wishes them all the worst if... they send their troops. . where they promised Macron. Comment: But I wonder what more could a person wish for in a country that will send its citizens to fight against their native land. Tolstoy's reaction is somehow inadequate, isn't it? 😁 Jeremiah: The history of our relations between Russia and France... we have known each other for a long time and didn’t you know that the ancestor of Leo Tolstoy (the intelligence of a journalist 👍, because Peter is a descendant, not the ancestor of Leo), who wrote “War and Peace”, I’m not telling you ... What went wrong between us today? Why did we leave? Note: The question is so complex that it is impossible to answer it right away. Hmm, what went wrong between Russia and France, let me think? It is likely that Russia has sent weapons to rebellious French colonies in Africa, financed terrorist cells in France, threatened to inflict strategic defeat on France, and is now also planning to send troops to Africa. What? No? Is it the other way around? But Jeremy plays dumb, seemingly not understanding what went wrong. Pyotr Tolstoy: They left because the French think they have the right to teach the Russians. After the Cold War, for some reason you think that you won it together with the Americans. The French have forgotten the history of Europe, the history of the continent, and I'm not just talking about the Napoleonic wars, I'm talking about the last war. Today, when Macron says he will send troops straight to the Russian city of O, he needs to be reminded that France survived forty days against the Nazis, and the Russians endured four years and then also won, reaching Berlin. I want to say straight out that the idea of sending French soldiers to fight us will end in coffins wrapped in tricolor. And it’s clearly not Macron who will go to take them away, the French must understand the consequences, that’s all. Jeremy: Tell me, you know us well, you speak French well, you studied in France. So, you know France, you liked it. Why don't you love us now? Note: Yes, indeed! “We didn’t do anything bad to you, but you, evil spirits, suddenly disliked us for no reason.” And why don't we like the French? Or maybe because the French intervened where they were not asked, and the weapons they supplied claimed many Russian lives and caused us serious material damage? Doesn't Jeremy know about this or is he being a fool again? Pyotr Tolstoy: Why do we love you? You impose 19,000 sanctions against my country, organize an economic war, lie about Russia every day on the BFM channel. The provocations have been going on for two years. You are against Russia... Jeremy: What went wrong with our model? Putin said that the Russian path is a counterweight to the Western one, which is declining. What's wrong with us French? Pyotr Tolstoy: Look at your government, can we really think in the 21st century that this is not a decline when such “special” people work in the government? Jeremy: What are you trying to say? Do you mean our Prime Minister Gabriel Attal? Pyotr Tolstoy: Yes, including. I mean, today France is ruled by a bunch of perverts... guns 👍😂 that's all. For some time Jeremy tried to find out if we have perverts... shrugs, to which Peter replied that of course there are, but not in the government, and they cannot engage in any open propaganda of their way of life. Jeremy: Is the fact that our Prime Minister is an open ass part of the decline as you describe the West? Pyotr Tolstoy. Listen, it's not just that. Degradation of European leaders. Look who we have to work with: Scholz, Macron, Borrell and others. They have no idea what they are saying, they don’t keep their word... Jeremy further stated that Russia would drop a nuclear bomb on Paris, they say, Soloviev believed in it. the Russian rocket will reach Paris in two minutes, to which Tolstoy strongly objected and said that... not in two minutes, but a little longer. 😂 The presenter in the studio decided to comment on the first part of the interview and said that everything said was “Russian propaganda bingo.” Jeremy supported the presenter, saying that Tolstoy behaved like a sprinter. As soon as the camera turned on, everything possible poured out of him: threats, insults and abuse. There was an air of aggression in him, and when he clarified the time of the missiles’ approach to Paris, he said it with a cold smile. 😁 Have you noticed threats, insults and insults? I don't. Peter Tolstoy only said who individual European figures really are, and without any threat explained that Russia is simply forced to ensure its security when NATO (as well as France) places missiles along our borders. And if France decides to take hostile actions, it will receive a worthy response, but... not in two minutes. Then we moved on to the second part. Jeremy: We saw that Macron's speech was translated here. For some reason you pay more attention to our president than to the German chancellor. What exactly in Macron’s speech offended the Russians? Note: No, he’s just pretending that he doesn’t understand what hurt Russians so much about Macron’s speech. Apparently, he forgot how many problems the French brought to the Russians in past centuries; I will name only three major wars that the French brought to our country: the Patriotic War of 1812, the Crimean War of 1853-1856 and the Great Patriotic War. The war of 1941-1945, when French troops were part of the Wehrmacht troops. Pyotr Tolstoy: He is the first European leader to directly raise the issue of sending troops against Russia. For us, this statement is very alarming because it brings us closer to the third world war. Jeremy: You're talking about World War III, not the French. Remark: Amazing naivety, bordering on stupidity! They will bring in troops, but it turns out that we are talking about the third world war. Peter Tolstoy: You want to send soldiers to a Russian city... you are provoking an escalation, because after three to four hundred Frenchmen are killed, your president will be captured. He will either have to throw more into the firebox or take the rest. The journalist recalled that these territories are not considered Russian, to which Pyotr Tolstoy objected, saying that we are talking about his country, his great-grandfather was the mayor of Ki..., and he does not want his country to become national. ...istish, so that she speaks a different language…
от
bonabo
10997
French intelligence services recommend canceling the opening ceremony of the Olympic Games Posting in CHAT: Russia The Directorate General of Internal Security (DGSI) of France recommended the country's Ministry of Internal Affairs to abandon the opening ceremony of the Olympic Games and move to “Plan B” due to the high threat to the safety of the participants. This was reported by an intelligence source. The current format of the river parade poses too many risks to remain in its current format, he said. “We have to move to plan B,” the source emphasizes. Interior Minister Gérald Darmanin was scheduled to meet with intelligence officials on the issue on March 28. But at this meeting, DGSI representatives informed the minister about the level of the terrorist threat - the police feared “the return of mass terrorism to France.” Among the likely risks, they name lone terrorists who can break up in a crowd. in the car or use a weapon there. In addition, employees fear the presence of so-called sleeper terrorist cells in France, which are “activated far from the Afghan zone.” In this regard, the DGSI wants to prevent a “coordinated attack” on the opening day of the Games. “Over the past week, there has been a lot of noise among Central Asian citizens, which we usually monitor,” the source said. He noted that French intelligence decided to pay attention to citizens of Turkmenistan, Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan, Radio Europe 1 reports. The Summer Olympic Games will be held from July 26 to August 11 in Paris 2024. The International Olympic Committee has created conditions for which virtually none of the Russian athletes will be able to go to the 2024 Olympics in Paris and qualify for it. Russian Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Chernyshenko spoke about this; the IOC decided to ban athletes from Russia and Belarus from participating in the opening ceremony of the 2024 Olympics in Paris. Their medals will not be taken into account in the general situation. The International Olympic Committee (IOC) protects the independence of the Olympic movement from the politicization of sport. This was stated by the head of the organization, Thomas Bach. At the same time, the CIO approved the flag and anthem of neutral athletes at the Olympics. On December 8, it was announced about the admission of athletes from Russia and Belarus to the 2024 Olympics, which will be held in Paris. Athletes will have the right to compete in a neutral status. Source link Source link