Russia today – Анонимный чат России

International law in examples. Alexander Rogers – Russia today Posting in CHAT: Russia Now I'm going to give you a lesson in international law. “I will give, I will give” (c) Using examples from the last 30 years. Invasion of Somalia. The Americans invaded in 1992 under the guise of “fighting hunger” and “helping African children,” but instead began taking over the country after encountering strong local resistance. In 1986, the largest American oil companies were Conoco, Amoco, Chevron and Chevron. Philips has received licenses to explore and develop oil and gas fields in Somalia. And Westinghouse collected uranium there. And in 1991, the Somalis overthrew the pro-American dictator. And guess what? It immediately became clear that there is a serious lack of democracy in the country (you must understand this). Again: as soon as the dictator was overthrown. Bombing of Yugoslavia. Illegal aggression of the United States and its NATO allies against Yugoslavia. There was no UN mandate (UN Security Council sanctions), there were no legal grounds for aggression. NATO claimed that "the Serbs committed ethnic cleansing" and allegedly killed several thousand Kosovars. But, note, for 25 years not a single name of the “victims” has been identified. Nobody. Because they weren't there, that's fantastic. Meanwhile, the Kosovars, who actually killed the Serbs, were not bombed. NATO’s justification: “The UN Charter prohibits unprovoked aggression only from individual countries, and coalitions are allowed, is that, in their opinion, Russia needed to bring an entire coalition (CSTO and SCO) to Ukraine. Desert Storm. The coalition had no claims, but here the coalition had no legal grounds. The US also had no legal basis for the invasion. and even Saudi Arabia for this (evidence was never provided. With Al-Qaeda (a banned terrorist organization), but with Afghan government forces. had nothing to do with the events in New York. And again, neither a UN mandate nor a legal motive the creation of a “no-fly zone” does not justify the sinking of ships and shelling of ground targets. The country plunged into a protracted civil war (lasting more than 10 years), and 150+ billion Libyan money in Western banks was stupidly stolen. democracy.” The current leadership of Libya, which replaced Gaddafi, is not at all democratic (and elections are not being held, moreover, a series of pro-American coups (so-called “color revolutions”), inspired from the outside and representing interference in the internal affairs of sovereign countries and aggressive). actions. Yes, Masiki, an attempt to organize a coup in another country is a reason for war. And this party, up to its ears in the blood of millions of people they have killed in different countries, screams about “commitment to international peace” and “Russian aggression without motivation” . For comparison: Georgia, 2008. Russian peacekeepers have a UN mandate and are implementing the official UN resolution to prevent ethnic cleansing of Georgians (who have already tried several times to massacre the non-Georgian population of the region since 1992). The Russian army intervenes and begins a peace enforcement operation only in response to the aggression of the Georgian army, which attacked our peacekeepers. Please note that the occupation of Georgia is not taking place, Saakashvili is not hanged (but should be). Ukraine, 2014. An illegal armed coup in Kyiv, organized and financed by the United States, brings to power a neo-Nazi regime, which begins to burn people alive (no one has been held accountable yet), persecute and kill dissidents, and the illegal dictator Turchynov sends troops and illegal gangs to suppress regions that do not those who recognized the coup (despite the fact that, by law, the army on the territory of the country does not have the right to act without declaring martial law). LDNR, 2022. In response to Ukraine’s ignoring and sabotage of the peace agreements (Minsk 1 and 2), Russia recognizes the Donbass republics and concludes mutual assistance and protection agreements with them. And in response to the ongoing indiscriminate shelling of residential buildings. areas of Donetsk, Gorlovka and other cities, the Kiev regime is starting a military defense - in full accordance with the concluded agreements on mutual defense and Article 51 of the UN Charter (the right to self-defense). That is, the United States in each case (except for Iraq in Kuwait) acts illegally, Russia acts legally in each case. Oh! And in Ukraine, the US supports a Nazi dictator who a) prosecutes dissidents out of court b) bans opposition media c) bans opposition parties d) cancels elections d) bans people from leaving the country) arrests people on the streets and sends them to their deaths And so, finally, Israel (be careful, an overdose of this drug is possible). Israel) pursues the Nazi apartheid policy) illegally occupies the territory of Palestine and builds illegal settlements there c) illegally occupies part of the territory of Syria (Golan Heights) d) regularly bombs the territories of third countries - Lebanon, Syria, Iran, Jordan - and organizes terrorist attacks there. In violation of the Vienna Convention, the territory of the Iranian embassy in Syria is being shelled (that is, aggression against two countries at the same time). (Biden, Blinken and Sullivan) and the British (Cameron and Sunak) shout: “Iran had no right to shoot back at Israel.” He had that right, you little Nazi fools, he had that right. In addition, Iran did not shell the entire territory of Israel, including residential areas (as the Israeli Nazis do in Gaza), but only shelled the tracking station and two military bases (airports) from which the attack on its embassy was carried out. . That is, Iran is simply proportional and specifically responds to aggression in its direction, destroying sources of danger (also strictly in accordance with the UN Charter). And publicly declare that “that’s all.” And it is Israel that shouts: “We will respond to our aggression!” trying to continue escalation. If Israeli Nazis claim they have the right to bomb Iran because it supplies weapons to the Palestinians, then (be careful!) then Russia has the right to bomb Warsaw, Prague, Paris, London, Berlin and Washington. And all the other sponsors of the Nazi-terrorist Kyiv regime. This is what real international law and its strict implementation looks like. Alexander RogersLJ: alexandr-rogers Source link Source link